No, I'm using "111.222.333" in place of the first 3 octets of the real
IP. I'm not about to put out the real IP to the list, security concerns.
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Alexandr S. Agranovsky wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 12:16:14 +0500
> From: Alexandr S. Agranovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jim Roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Routing problems
>
> Hello, Jim Roland,
>
> JR> eth0 (111.222.333.254) connected to a hub (static route to 111.222.333.1
> JR> mask /32)
> JR> eth1 (111.222.333.253) connected to a hub
> JR> eth2 (192.168.0.1) connected to a hub
> JR> T1 router (111.222.333.1) connected to a hub
> JR> Workstations inside the 111.222.333.x subnet have their gateway set to
> JR> 111.222.333.253.
>
> 111.222.333 are real IP of your interbal subnet or you only substitued
> real IPs by figural ones?
>
> 333 is not a valid part of IP address, at least (numbers are bytes and
> must be between 0 and 255).
>
> --
> Alexandr S. Agranovsky
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
