Hello! > That's a *very* high load percentage. We put over 20MB/sec through old P100 > systems with two fast ethernets channel bonded using Tulip 21140 cards on > 2.0.30, and it put about that load (slightly less) on the system. Well, all the things have tendency to degrade with time. But what memory bandwidth did this old P100 have? Even if to reduce transfer to one plain bcopy, you had >60MB/sec. I daresay it was pretty mighty P100. 8) Seems, hardware also degrades. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking ... kuznet
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talk... Gregory Maxwell
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to S... Donald Becker
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solaris2.6... shane
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solar... James Sutherland
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solar... Jes Sorensen
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to S... James Sutherland
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to Solar... kuznet
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking to S... Donald Becker
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking ... kuznet
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talk... Richard Gooch
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2... kuznet
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2... Richard Gooch
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2... kuznet
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2... James Sutherland
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talk... shane
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2... kuznet
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2... James Sutherland
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2... Andrey Savochkin
- Re: Possible TCP Problem with RH6.2 talking ... Jes Sorensen
