Yes obviously I have that particular rule or its variation.
>On Thu, 18 May 2000, Bruce wrote:
>
>> As I have referred to in other messages, we have this person/people
>> hammering our site on port 137 - every day and every IP address.
>>
>
>Those people are in Redmond Washington and this is the way that they
>designed their software.
>
>> Now the nmbd netbios name server is currently not in use and I have been
>> thinking about enabling it with some very false information primarily to
>> scramble this idiots brain.
>>
>> Is this ethical and are there any suggestions?
>
>In this instance, it's probably not a question of ethics -- do what the
>rest of us do and have a rule such as:
>
>ipchains -A input -i <external interface> -p UDP --dport
>netbios-ns:netbios-ssn -j DENY
>
>In other words, get over it....
Thanks spoilsport!!
>
>-Tom
>--
>Tom Eastep \ Eastep's First Principle of Computing:
>ICQ #60745924 \ "Any sane computer will tell you how it
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ works if you ask it the proper questions"
>Shoreline, Washington USA \___________________________________________
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
>the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
