Jes Sorensen writes:
> >>>>> "Richard" == Richard Gooch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Richard> Indeed. A procmail recipe even avoids you having to see the
> Richard> crap in the first place. I can see why some people use the
> Richard> base64 abortion, though: if they inline a patch it gets
> Richard> filled with "=3D" gunk, because they're using some or other
> Richard> character set encoding :-(
>
> Happens just as often from people with iso8859-1 setups due to
> broken / misconfigured mail clients.
Nod. And then there's the problem of HTML spam.
> >> Kim, if you want Gigabit Ethernet I'd strongly recommend you
> >> consider porting whatever it is you have that requires 2.0.x onto
> >> 2.2.x or later.
>
> Richard> It might not be a 2.0.36 driver that is needed. It may be the
> Richard> 2.0.36 reliability!
>
> 2.0.36 reliawhat?? If you are looking for GigE performance you are
> likely to want SMP and SMP in 2.0.36 is absolutely not realiable.
There's a strong perception that 2.0.36 is robust (even though SMP
isn't). I see people pushing for XYZ driver to be added to 2.0.3x for
this reason. I assume if Kim is willing to back-port the GigE driver
to 2.0.36, the option of forward-porting some other driver was also
considered.
As for SMP "requirements": perhaps Kim has a 1 GHz Athalon and figures
that should do nicely :-)
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
