Linux-Networking Digest #500, Volume #10 Mon, 15 Mar 99 02:13:40 EST
Contents:
Re: MS Explorer 4.0 for Unix Quote of the month (Olof Oberg)
Re: NDS & Linux (Frank Miles)
WHEW! samba works! (Pete)
Re: Problems with Samba and Suse 6.0 (2.0.36) (David Kirkpatrick)
DSL linux net unreachable, 98 net reachable (Glenn Graham)
Re: PPP Problems (configure-nak/rej ? error) (Brad)
Re: Linux----->W98----->modem------>internet (M. Buchenrieder)
Re: How do I boot Monitor-less 486 without a login and then... ? (Miguel Cruz)
Re: SUSE6.0 @ Pcmcia modem (Boudewijn W. Ch. Visser)
eth0 Error mssg ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: What is this? Hummm (JoHn DoH)
How to telnet as root (Paul)
Re: PPP Problems (configure-nak/rej ? error) (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: smbmount won't work (Alexander Maus)
Re: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2 (Malware)
Re: Win98 >< Linux (Nonet Pasquali)
Re: 3c509 & ne2000 conflict ("mike upham")
Re: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2 (Christoph)
What is this? Hummm ("Derek Kwan - http://Derek.KWAN.on.ca")
Linux workgroup ("Joven (Another Linux User!)")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Olof Oberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,alt.linux,linux.redhat.misc,comp.windows.x.kde
Subject: Re: MS Explorer 4.0 for Unix Quote of the month
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:40:37 GMT
Miguel Rodriguez wrote:
> I am a professional web-designer and I can tell you that the majority of
> most high-quality, professional design is done by hand. There are
> situations where some kind of editor will help but they are the
> rareity(sp?). Hand coding is the only way to truly ensure that the page
> ends up looking exactly how you intended it to. I have never seen a WYSIWYG
> editor that was truly What You See Is What You Get. More often it is What
> You See Is What You Hope You Get. Plus most of the liscences on these
> programs are outrageously expensive.
You will never "ensure that the page ends up looking exactly
how you intended it to" because HTML isn't a layout language.
Although most 'web designers' seem to think that.
/mill
--
#############################################################
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] # http://pedgr571.sn.umu.se/~mill #
#############################################################
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Miles)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: NDS & Linux
Date: 15 Mar 1999 05:47:07 GMT
In article <7cglet$ejj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there some kind of NDS system for linux??
Caldera has released several pieces which have made their way into most if
not all distributions. In Debian, for example, there are ipx and ncpfs
packages. The Caldera distribution clearly leads in this area. You should
be able to find a variety of on-line documentation (HOWTOs and FAQs) related
to these basic functions.
It's not as complete a system as you might like -- certainly nothing like
what you would find in OS/2, for example -- but may well be adequate for
the normal user.
-frank
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: WHEW! samba works!
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:52:48 GMT
After 3 months of trying, I finally got samba up and running between my
linux and win95 box.
Now i'm going to be greedy and ask a question --
Can I set up samba so that ANYBODY can log in with no (blank) password and
have super user access to the entire system? In other words, none of my
linux accounts have passwords and I'd like samba to have NO security.
I have no security issues since my cat is not a very good typist...
Thanks!
Pete
--
===============================================================
http://landau.ucdavis.edu/psalzman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One world, one web, one program. -- Microsoft Ad Campaign
Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer. -- Nazi Ad Campaign
Prevent world domination, Install Linux today!
===============================================================
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problems with Samba and Suse 6.0 (2.0.36)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:01:05 GMT
Francisco,
Look at the man for smbpasswd. Also verify the encryption
side of smb in cmb.conf. In the long haul it may be better to
change the Linux side as the changing the MS side will probably
cause other MS things to go wrong.
Have you mapped the drives on the MS side? It sound like they
are mapped but not on line at the moment. Can you click on my
computer and have a drive tag for the smb drive? Does it have a
red x at its bottom?
Have you added the drives in smb.conf like was done for the
printer? Are they public?
What is security and what is encrypt passwords?
What is the exact operation you do to get access on the MS
side? What is the exact error message?
Francisco Jose Toledano Alcala wrote:
>
> ¿Somebody know why connecting from one client with Win98 to a Linux
> Server with Samba,
> client can see shares, but it can't access then?
> When double click on one shared (hd in example), Windows say (share not
> found), but
> can see it in net explorer.
> In registry of windows, I enabled text password.
> Client, otherwise, can use bsd printer declared in samba.conf and can
> access home directories.
>
> Can someone help me?
>
> Thank's in advance and regards from Córdoba (Spain)
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> [global]
> workgroup = enganche
> guest account = nobody
> keep alive = 30
> security = share
> printing = bsd
> printcap name = /etc/printcap
> load printers = yes
>
> ; Please uncomment the following entry and replace the
> ; ip number and netmask with the correct numbers for
> ; your ethernet interface.
> interfaces = 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0
>
> ; If you want Samba to act as a wins server, please set
> ; 'wins support = yes'
> wins support = no
>
> ; If you want Samba to use an existing wins server,
> ; please uncomment the following line and replace
> ; the dummy with the wins server's ip number.
> ; wins server = 192.168.1.1
>
> [homes]
> comment = Heimatverzeichnis
> browseable = no
> read only = no
> create mode = 0750
>
> ; The following share gives all users access to the Server's CD drive,
> ; assuming it is mounted under /cd. To enable this share, please remove
> ; the semicolons before the lines
> ;
> [cdrom]
> comment = Linux CD-ROM
> path = /mnt/cdrom
> read only = yes
> locking = no
>
> [printers]
> comment = All Printers
> browseable = no
> printable = yes
> public = no
> read only = yes
> create mode = 0700
> directory = /tmp
>
> [hd]
> comment = Disco duro servidor
> path=/mnt/datos
> read only = no
> locking =no
> browseable = yes
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Glenn Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DSL linux net unreachable, 98 net reachable
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:01:20 GMT
My ISP gave me the following settings:
ip address: 10.160.16.42
mask: 255.255.255.248
gateway: 10.160.0.1
Under windows 98 if I use these settings I am able to get to the net.
If under Linux I use these settings the linux box cant even ping 10.160.0.1
I did a netstat -r under windows 98 to see what routes it was using and I got
this
Active Routes:
Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.160.0.1 10.160.16.42 1
10.160.16.40 255.255.255.248 10.160.16.42 10.160.16.42 1
10.160.16.42 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
10.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.160.16.42 10.160.16.42 1
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 10.160.16.42 10.160.16.42 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 10.160.16.42 0.0.0.0 1
Route Table
Active Connections
Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
Does anyone know what routes I need to do to linux to get it to do the same
thing as windows98?
Under linux I can ping myself and another 98 box connected as 10.160.16.43 so
I'm assuming that all is well with the network card etc.
Thanks in advance
Glenn
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Problems (configure-nak/rej ? error)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:01:41 GMT
Thanks for the help.
All it needed was ipcp-accept-local in the options file. Guess I should
read the man pages once in a while. :)
Brad
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: Linux----->W98----->modem------>internet
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:55:19 GMT
"GN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>1. Can a connect to the internet with my linux comp by going trough my
>win98computer who already is connected to Internet via modem?
[...]
This can be done, but not without getting additional software for
the Win98 box. If you do have the choice, put the modem onto
the Linux box and have your Win98 box going through the Linux
system instead (with IP-forwarding/IP-masquerading) . If the present
setup can't be changed, you'll need to get a proxy for the Win98 box
since Win9* doesn't do routing/forwarding at all.
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't mungle your address.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Subject: Re: How do I boot Monitor-less 486 without a login and then... ?
Date: 15 Mar 1999 06:01:56 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, IanP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a shiny new PII with two hard disks, the first with windows 98
> and the second with Redhat 5.1. networking (soon) with my faithful old
> 486. I want the 486 to boot without asking for a login and password,
> being monitorless.
Linux isn't like Windows; it's a multiple-user system. If you don't log in
at the console, that has no impact on anything else going on. So just throw
the monitor out the window, stomp on the keyboard, you're good to go.
miguel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Boudewijn W. Ch. Visser)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.dial-up,comp.os.linux,nl.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: SUSE6.0 @ Pcmcia modem
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:57:04 GMT
Was it necessary to spam your question to so many newsgroups ?
Followup set to nl.comp.os.linux ,as you seem to be dutch and that's the
group I'm reading it.
On Sun, 28 Feb 1999 11:15:55 +0100, Jos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Machine: Mynote 810 notebook
>CPU: Amd k6-II/300Mhz
>96Mb / 4Gig hdd
>OS: SuSE 6.0 Linux, KDE Enviroment
>
>-------------------------
>
>Hi!
>
>I have just installed SuSE Linux on my notebook.
>I'd like to know if it's possible to use a pcmcia modem
>under linux. Does anybody know how to do this?
>
Yes, if you have a supported PCMCIA card this is easily possible.
The card will behave like any other serial modem. I've used this
with an Xircom Ethernet/Modem card.
For PCMCIA cards, see
http://hyper.stanford.edu/HyperNews/get/pcmcia/home.html
Just look at the supported cards, and watch out for winmodem-cards.
Boudewijn
--
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
|Boudewijn Visser | E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| -finger for PGP-keys.- | http://www.ph.tn.tudelft.nl/~visser |
+-- my own opinions etc ---------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: eth0 Error mssg
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:50:06 GMT
I keep having this error mssg :
eth0: transmission timed out, tx_status 00 status e000
Does anyone know what it means?
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: JoHn DoH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What is this? Hummm
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:12:24 GMT
They are probably just little hacks that do not know anything. They are
running some cheese telnet login deamon (I have seen many) and then your
system kicks them off after a few attempts and then they think that
their software sucks or something (I would not know about failed
attempts ;-). If you are worried just ad the ips to your
/etc/hosts.deny list or turn off telnet all together in the
/etc/inetd.conf file.
"Derek Kwan - http://Derek.KWAN.on.ca" wrote:
>
> Hello World,
>
> Lately I have noticed a very different kind of scan. That is people
> seems like is keep trying to 'telnet' to my box, but always 3-4 times in
> a row... First couple time, I think people just want to telnet in... but
> after 2 weeks and the pattern is pretty consistent then I start
> wondering what is going on. And btw, does anyone know what are the L, S,
> I, F and T stands for?
>
> Derek
>
> Feb 27 10:38:31 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 171.xxx.97.249:1414
JoHn 'DoH' KeLm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"People are too stupid to realize they are" - DoH
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul)
Subject: How to telnet as root
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:13:26 GMT
Can anyone tell me how to allow root telnet access to a Linux box?
I've added .rhosts file to root's home directory but it seems to be
PAM authentication that is preventing it.
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Problems (configure-nak/rej ? error)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:03:24 GMT
Generic info for RH 5.2. Assumption: you installed PPP.
===================================================================
RH puts ppp scripts in /usr/doc/ppp-2.3.5
Copy ppp-on, ppp-on-dialer, options to /etc/ppp.
Copy /dev/null into options.
===================================================================
Modify ppp-on by editing the following:
TELEPHONE, ACCOUNT, PASSWORD
==================================================================
For exec command. put in correct device probably
cua1 (for RH5.2) and modem speed
===================================================================
Edit /etc/resolv.conf and put in ISP nameserver given you by your
ISP.
nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
You usually get two from your isp.
====================================================================
execute ppp-on & and monitor logs with
tail -f /var/log/messages.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
OR:
Control Pannel: Modem configuration. Select
correct device. (used in ppp-on script)
===================================================================
Control Pannel: Network Configurator: Routing: Defaults blank
PPP0 will use this so needs a blank here.
===================================================================
Network Configurator: Names: insert ISP
nameserver addresses.
===================================================================
System Configurator: PPP/SLIP/PLIP: Configurations, Add
Fill in Hardware, Communication. Assumes PAP not
required - If things do not work check with ISP.
==================================================================
Save quit. Verify /etc/resolv.conf has your ISP
addresses.
==================================================================
The linuxconf sets up most things but does not
setup the ppp-on script - that must be done by hand.
==================================================================
Testing:
cd /etc/ppp
execute ppp-on
Ping locally between your network machines to insure your ok.
Ping some net address by ip number like 10.220.10.120. Once ppp
is connected.
Verify your name server working, ping boston.com or do an
nslookup microsoft.com
When not dialed in ping someother box locally by name
to insure yor local resolution is working say if
done by the /etc/hosts and /etc/lmhosts.
Brad wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> After using RH 4.2 (I think) for the past few years, I decided to upgrade
> to RH 5.2, and am having troubles getting PPP to work. It worked fine
> before when I set it up with netcfg. Basically, in Windows, I dial in,
> enter a username and password, then at the prompt, type 'ppp', then enter,
> then hit F7. I am setting up the account the same way I had it before, I
> am assigned an IP number by the server, no PAP, but am still not able to
> connect. I included a little bit from /var/log/messages below.
> Some of the problem looks like it may be trying to use Appletalk or
> something. The kernel is compiled with PPP support. The problem may be in
> my /etc/ppp/options file, although I can't remember how it was set up
> before. Does anyone have any suggestions about what I can try?
>
> Thanks
> Brad
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Feb 27 19:31:13 VeloRevolution pppd[375]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: abort on (BUSY)
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: abort on (ERROR)
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: abort on (Invalid Login)
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: abort on (Login incorrect)
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: send (ATL1^M)
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: expect (OK)
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: ATL1^M^M
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: OK
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: -- got it
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: send (ATDT2977488^M)
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: expect (CONNECT)
> Feb 27 19:31:14 VeloRevolution chat[380]: ^M
> Feb 27 19:31:31 VeloRevolution chat[380]: ATDT2977488^M^M
> Feb 27 19:31:31 VeloRevolution chat[380]: CONNECT
> Feb 27 19:31:31 VeloRevolution chat[380]: -- got it
> Feb 27 19:31:31 VeloRevolution chat[380]: send (^M)
> Feb 27 19:31:31 VeloRevolution chat[380]: expect (Username:)
> Feb 27 19:31:31 VeloRevolution chat[380]: 26400/ARQ/V34/LAPM/V42BIS^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: University of Pittsburgh Dialin
> Service *** Authorized Users Only ***^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: ^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: *** Please enter your user name
> in lower case ***^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: ^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: ehdup-l.ts line 14 ^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: ^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: ^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: User Access Verification^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: ^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: Username:
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: -- got it
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: send (bafst19^M)
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: expect (Password:)
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: bafst19^M
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: Password:
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: -- got it
> Feb 27 19:31:32 VeloRevolution chat[380]: send (******^M)
> Feb 27 19:31:33 VeloRevolution chat[380]: expect (Local>)
> Feb 27 19:31:33 VeloRevolution chat[380]: ^M
> Feb 27 19:31:33 VeloRevolution chat[380]: Local>
> Feb 27 19:31:33 VeloRevolution chat[380]: -- got it
> Feb 27 19:31:33 VeloRevolution chat[380]: send (ppp^M)
> Feb 27 19:31:33 VeloRevolution pppd[375]: Serial connection established.
> Feb 27 19:31:34 VeloRevolution pppd[375]: Using interface ppp0
> Feb 27 19:31:34 VeloRevolution pppd[375]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
> Feb 27 19:31:37 VeloRevolution pppd[375]: Unsupported protocol (0x8029)
> received
> Feb 27 19:31:37 VeloRevolution pppd[375]: Unsupported protocol (0x802b)
> received
> Feb 27 19:31:40 VeloRevolution pppd[375]: Received bad configure-nak/rej:
> 03 06 88 8e 15 f4
> Feb 27 19:32:07 VeloRevolution last message repeated 9 times
> Feb 27 19:32:10 VeloRevolution pppd[375]: IPCP: timeout sending
> Config-Requests
> Feb 27 19:32:10 VeloRevolution pppd[375]: Connection terminated.
> Feb 27 19:32:11 VeloRevolution pppd[375]: Exit.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Alexander Maus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb,linux.samba
Subject: Re: smbmount won't work
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:13:00 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> Ok, I have a Win98 computer on my lan with a shared drive. I can access this
> drive using smbclient, however, I can not mount the drive using smbmount.
>
> I am currently using a Red Hat 5.1 System, with Kernel 2.2.1 and I compiled
> and installed Samba 2.0.2. Here is the output:
>
> [root@tf linux]# smbmount //BUBBA/D/ /mnt -C -P shared
> mount error: Invalid argument
> Please look at smbmount's manual page for possible reasons
>
> Any ideas? I've searched this newsgroup up and down and I haven't found any
> working suggestions yet. I *DID* Patch Samba using the patch from teh
> following page, however, it did not make a difference:
>
> http://www.csupomona.edu/~pelaufer/samba/
>
> Please help me!! :)
>
> Bryan
>
> ps. please CC: a response via email, thanks!
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
I've the same problem. But I try to connect to an AIX-Unix-System with
SAMBA-shares.
I previously asked about it in the newsgroups, but the only answer I got
was that I should try to recompile the smbmount-source.
... It didn't work....
If you find something out, please tell me about it.
Alexander
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.ppp,at.linux
Subject: Re: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:04:52 GMT
Hi Christoph,
you wrote:
> After sponsoring our Austria Telekom by trying out various pppd options
> (unsuccessfully), I realized that the kernel was unable to find (or load)
> the ppp-compression modules:
>
> If you insert them manually by calling
> modprobe ppp_deflate; modprobe bsd_comp
> everything works fine. (at least it worked for me).
The probably better way is to add following lines to /etc/conf.modules:
alias ppp-compress-21 bsd_comp
alias ppp-compress-24 ppp_deflate # From original RFC draft
alias ppp-compress-26 ppp_deflate # Final standard per ppp-2.3.4
README
This way the modules can be loaded on demand and unload if they are no
longer used.
Malware
------------------------------
From: Nonet Pasquali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win98 >< Linux
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:53:43 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Okay its been two weeks and I am no closer to getting my two boxes networked
> as I was when I started. Heres what I got:
>
> Linux RH5.1
> 486 Dx-50
> 20MB Ram
> 420HD
> 3com 3c509
> IP:192.168.1.1
>
> Win98
> P-200MMX
> 96MB Ram
> 1.6GHD
> 3com Fast EtherLink XL 10/100Mb TX
> IP:192.168.1.2
>
> The Link light on my Linux box is on until the card is initalized at boot then
> it goes off. When I go into Network Configurator in X it shows the card it
> active. Only when I deactivat the card does the link light come on. On the
> Win98 box the light is NEVER on. Not on boot, not while it pings itself,
> NEVER! I know this card works but I have never seen the light.
> Also am I correct in thinking that I do not have to have a hub to network
> these? I can just plug the network cable into the two right?
>
Not just any cable. A "NULL MODEM" or "CROSS-OVER" cable is required if you
don't use a hub.
Else, those little electrons never get there.
You can make your own with a crimp kit, or buy one for about the same price as a
crimp tool and 100' of cable.
------------------------------
From: "mike upham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3c509 & ne2000 conflict
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 00:28:43 -0600
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
=======_NextPart_000_0010_01BE6E7A.C89620A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My fix works if you have the ethernet drivers built into the kernel.
You must have to load the modules yourself. There is an ethernet
HOWTO at http://129.173.21.99/Ethernet-HOWTO.html#toc3 which
will show you how to do it. Or you could recompile the kernel as I
did and put the drivers into the kernel.
=======_NextPart_000_0010_01BE6E7A.C89620A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>My fix works if you have the ethernet drivers built =
into the=20
kernel.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>You must have to load the modules=20
yourself. There is an ethernet</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>HOWTO at <A=20
href=3D"http://129.173.21.99/Ethernet-HOWTO.html#toc3">http://129.173.21.=
99/Ethernet-HOWTO.html#toc3</A>=20
which</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>will show you how to do it. Or =
you could=20
recompile the kernel as I</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>did and put the drivers into the=20
kernel.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
=======_NextPart_000_0010_01BE6E7A.C89620A0==
------------------------------
From: Christoph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.ppp,at.linux
Subject: Re: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:56:45 GMT
In at.linux Andreas Grabner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> After I update my kernel to 2.2.x and pppd to 2.3.5 i can' t connect to
> my ISP when I boot kernel 2.2.
> when i boot 2.0.35 it works.
> i think there i a problem with LCP or in the kernel 2.2.2.
> i installed pppd 2.3.5 new and compile the kernel 2.2 new (maybe
> something goes wrong??)
I have run into the same problem a few weeks ago.
After sponsoring our Austria Telekom by trying out various pppd options
(unsuccessfully), I realized that the kernel was unable to find (or load)
the ppp-compression modules:
If you insert them manually by calling
modprobe ppp_deflate; modprobe bsd_comp
everything works fine. (at least it worked for me).
Good luck
Chris
------------------------------
From: "Derek Kwan - http://Derek.KWAN.on.ca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: What is this? Hummm
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:11:39 GMT
Hello World,
Lately I have noticed a very different kind of scan. That is people
seems like is keep trying to 'telnet' to my box, but always 3-4 times in
a row... First couple time, I think people just want to telnet in... but
after 2 weeks and the pattern is pretty consistent then I start
wondering what is going on. And btw, does anyone know what are the L, S,
I, F and T stands for?
Derek
Feb 27 10:38:31 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 171.xxx.97.249:1414
24.64.xxx.133:23 L=48 S=0x00 I=65489 F=0x0040 T=107
Feb 27 10:38:33 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 171.xxx.97.249:1414
24.64.xxx.133:23 L=48 S=0x00 I=4306 F=0x0040 T=107
Feb 27 10:38:39 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 171.xxx.97.249:1414
24.64.xxx.133:23 L=48 S=0x00 I=23762 F=0x0040 T=107
Feb 27 10:38:51 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 171.xxx.97.249:1414
24.64.xxx.133:23 L=48 S=0x00 I=54482 F=0x0040 T=107
Feb 27 10:48:49 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 171.xxx.97.249:4338
24.64.xxx.133:23 L=48 S=0x00 I=56321 F=0x0040 T=107
Feb 27 10:49:01 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 171.xxx.97.249:4338
24.64.xxx.133:23 L=48 S=0x00 I=61442 F=0x0040 T=107
Feb 27 18:59:47 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 152.xxx.217.137:1769
24.64.xxx.133:23 L=48 S=0x00 I=5205 F=0x0040 T=111
Feb 27 18:59:50 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 152.xxx.217.137:1769
24.64.xxx.133:23 L=48 S=0x00 I=13397 F=0x0040 T=111
Feb 27 18:59:57 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 152.xxx.217.137:1769
24.64.xxx.133:23 L=48 S=0x00 I=31317 F=0x0040 T=111
Feb 27 19:00:09 guard kernel: IP fw-in rej eth1 TCP 152.xxx.217.137:1769
24.64.xxx.133:23 L=48 S=0x00 I=4438 F=0x0040 T=111
------------------------------
From: "Joven (Another Linux User!)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux workgroup
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:07:05 GMT
What can I set up Linux as workgroup so other Win95 client can see my
Linux under network nebourhoot?
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
