Linux-Networking Digest #518, Volume #10         Tue, 16 Mar 99 15:13:43 EST

Contents:
  Multiple-Ethernet-mini-HOWTO ??? (Rene Tschirley)
  Re: pppd 2.3.5 connects/negotiates and then hangs up. (Clifford Kite)
  Running MSDOS programs over PPP ("K.A. Steensma")
  Re: Telnet serving? (Keith M Snellin)
  Re: Multiple-Ethernet-mini-HOWTO ??? ("Rufus V. Smith")
  Re: VNC (Kevin Martin)
  Re: Netscape ftp, port numbers and ipfwadm ("Duarte Cordeiro")
  Re: nt-client + sp4: =?iso-8859-1?Q?can=92t?= connect to linux/samba-box (Edward Lee)
  Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  write about networking ("Ann Shaffer")
  Re: More 3c905b ("Nadeem Ahmed")
  Re: can't ping Linux --> win98 ("news.jf.intel.com")
  Re: ISDN: What's a good adapter? (Jason McKnight)
  PPP on Compaq Presario notebook internal modem. ("Nadeem Ahmed")
  Re: Best books for Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Compression Problem (John Edwards)
  "carrier" in ifconfig output ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Saw the answer but lost the message! ("K.A. Steensma")
  Re: caching only dns & forwarders (Chad Eddings)
  Re: NIC card not initializing ("¤ñ¥d¶W")
  Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help (Vincent Fox)
  Re: PAP problems ("K.A. Steensma")
  Re: more samba problems (Paul Godward)
  Re: Kernel HOWTO accuracy? (Dan Nguyen)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rene Tschirley)
Subject: Multiple-Ethernet-mini-HOWTO ???
Date: 16 Mar 1999 15:18:17 GMT


Dear all,


I am going to set up a system with two ethernet-cards. Now I'm looking
for literature on how to configure the machine as a router (connecting
a few machines with a LAN (no subnet used).

The Multiple-Ethernet-mini-HOWTO doesn't exist anymore on either
sunsite.unc.edu nor www.lycos.com. What happened? Some other
resources?


Best regards,
                Rene
-- 
Dipl.-Inform. René Tschirley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone&Address: see http://cs.tu-berlin.de/~pooh
Technische Universität Berlin, FB Informatik, Fachgruppe Computer Graphics

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Re: pppd 2.3.5 connects/negotiates and then hangs up.
Date: 16 Mar 1999 08:25:15 -0600

Chris Gregors ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Here's the config. Linux RedHat 5.2 with ppp 2.3.5 patched into the
: kernel
: ppp.o is a module

: I can dial, handle the MSCHAP authentication fine, and the IP
: asssignments, but at the
: end of the negotiation, the modem hangs up...

<snip>

: Mar 15 18:48:05 chris pppd[656]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
: 0x11c8565d> <pcomp> <accomp>]

This first LCP ConfReq disagrees with the ppp options file shown below.
It doesn't ask for asyncmap 0 as the option file requires.

<snip>

: Mar 15 18:48:09 chris pppd[656]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
: 192.168.2.2> <compress VJ 0f 01>]

This first IPCP request disagrees with the pppd options file shown below.
It requests 192.168.2.2 as your IP address while the options files shows
0.0.0.0:0.0.0.0 so that it should ask for 0.0.0.0 .

What's going on here?  Inconsistencies like this make diagnosing the
problem rather difficult.

<snip>

: ------ start /etc/ppp/options ----------
: crtscts
: lock
: asyncmap 0x0
: debug
: bsdcomp 15
: ipcp-accept-remote
: 0.0.0.0:0.0.0.0
: name "domain\\userid"
: remotename "domain"
: -detach
: ------ end /etc/ppp/options ----------

--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                       Not a guru. (tm)
/* I gave up on politics when no matter who I voted for, I regretted it.
 *    -- Pepper...and Salt, WSJ */

------------------------------

From: "K.A. Steensma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Running MSDOS programs over PPP
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:42:58 GMT

I have a working dial-in ppp service (using mgetty / mgetty+sendfax) that allows
me to telnet, ftp, etc into a Linux Server machine.  I  (also) have a working
SAMBA Server that appears in the 'neighborhood networking' of any/all Win9X
machines that are networked to the server (via eth0).

I have modified the '/etc/smb.conf' file so that SAMBA provides 'wins support'.
On the Win9X machine (that will be dialing into the Linux Server), I have
modified the TSP/IP (for the dial-up adapter) to show that the Linux Server (at
192.168.0.1) is going to provide WINS Resolution.

What I need to do is to dial into the server and see the SAMBA shares (so that I
can map a SAMBA share over to a drive letter) and run a MSDOS program (that is
stored on the Linux machine).  Right now, it doesn't work.

When I dial into the Linux server, the Windows9X IP configuration program shows
that it knows that there is a Primary WINS Server, but shows that Wins Proxy is
disabled.

Where do I go (go a HOWTO or URL) to find that answers for what I need to do to
finish this project?  TIA  KAS

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Keith M Snellin)
Subject: Re: Telnet serving?
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:13:32 GMT

On Tue, 16 Mar 1999 13:32:32 +0800, Byron Hobbs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I have a linux server set up on one computer which is being used as a
>games server. I have set it up so that you can telnet into the computer
>and change the game being played in a menu system which i have set up.
>Only problem is, is that when I telnet into the linux server from a Win98
>machine it takes about 1 minute for the login to come up on the screen. I
>have tried many different things but nothing seems to work
>       Can someone please help
>

The delay is casued by the linux telnetd trying to do a reverse dns
lookup on your Win98's Ip address and getting no response from its dns
server. Have a look in /etc/resolv.conf and see what name servers you
are trying to use.  

Hope this helps.
regards.

Keith M Snelin 

------------------------------

From: "Rufus V. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multiple-Ethernet-mini-HOWTO ???
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 10:36:53 -0500


Rene Tschirley wrote in message <7clsnp$moq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>Dear all,
>
>
>I am going to set up a system with two ethernet-cards. Now I'm looking
>for literature on how to configure the machine as a router (connecting
>a few machines with a LAN (no subnet used).
>
>The Multiple-Ethernet-mini-HOWTO doesn't exist anymore on either
>sunsite.unc.edu nor www.lycos.com. What happened? Some other
>resources?
>
>
>Best regards,
> Rene
>--
>Dipl.-Inform. René Tschirley, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Phone&Address: see http://cs.tu-berlin.de/~pooh
>Technische Universität Berlin, FB Informatik, Fachgruppe Computer Graphics

Have you looked at the Linux Router Project?
http://www.linuxrouter.org/

I think they may have a ready-to-run solution, but I haven't had
a chance to dig deep yet.

Rufus




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Martin)
Subject: Re: VNC
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:51:15 GMT

In article <7clg2i$tbf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, it says Iztok Polanic 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello !!!
>
>Has naybody had any luck with starting netscape from vncviewer?

Using VNC on Windows to view the Linux box, it works quite well -- as good 
as the free X I was using, or better.  Yes, even running Netscape on the 
Linux box from a window on Win98 (I needed to download some stuff directly 
to the Linux box).

Trying to go the other way, viewing a Win box on Linux, vncviewer seg faults 
and dumps core instantly.  Doesn't matter what parameters I try to give it, 
or none.  I'm using VNC 3.3.2 on RedHat 5.0, kernel 2.0.35.

If anyone has a clue, I'd be grateful.

------------------------------

From: "Duarte Cordeiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netscape ftp, port numbers and ipfwadm
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:33:06 -0000


david koski wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello,
>
>When attempting to ftp with Netscape 4.04 (RH 5.1 server and ppp
>connection to ISP) I cannot get through my firewall.  I noticed that the
>port numbers reported on the status line of Netscape are 1025..65535
>(high).  I can however ftp at the prompt.  The same thing is true on the
>Windoze and OS/2 clients Netscape.  Ftp programs work on the clients
>too, but not Netscape's ftp.  What gives?

hehe... a strange think indeed...
Ftp has two working models: passive and non-passive (someone called it
active)
I never know the order but:
- One uses port 20 to connect and port 21 to send data (ftp-data)
- The other uses port 20 to connect and port > 1024 to send data.
Don't know why, but ie or netscape, both use this later model, so the only
way for you to let the data pass is to open incoming connections to ports
>1024, I think...


Hope it helps,

PS: If you find another way to resolve this, please tell me how :)

  Duarte Cordeiro



------------------------------

From: Edward Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: nt-client + sp4: =?iso-8859-1?Q?can=92t?= connect to linux/samba-box
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 09:55:45 -0800

We have the same problems with our Win95 and NTs.
Basic Win95 and NT4.0 works with Linux/Samba,
but Win98 (95+sp3) and NT 4.3 (4.0+sp3) does not.
We just have to avoid all the service packs and software
depending on it (Internet Explorer and Active Desktop).
Fortunately, netscape still works without Microsoft Security Packs.

Hubert Ming wrote:

> hello samba gurus
> i'm quite new to linux / samba. no i have setup a linux box with samba
> 1.9.18. my client's are win-nt-boxes with sp4 !! i can browse the
> network-folder on the nt-box an i see the linux/samba-server. but when i
> try to conncet to the samba-shares i get a dialog box: incorrect
> password or unkown user name ???? the user i try to connect with is a
> valid linux-user (passwd) and a valid nt-user as well. i'have set
> 'encrypt passwords = yes' in the smb.conf file and i created a smbpasswd
> file in the /usr/local/samba/private directory with mksmbpasswd.
> so what am i doing wrong.... how can i reach the penguin...
> thanx alot for any help
> hubert


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.ps.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:42:09 GMT

I was able to get masquerading working such that ppp0 is my v.90 modem and
eth0 is the nic connected to my win95 box.  I'm trying to prepare for a
future installation of a cable modem and so I also have a second nic, eth1
installed which will hopefully replace ppp0.  The funny thing is, if I
activate eth1, masquerading stops working.  As soon as I deactivate eth1, it
works again.  I tried messing with the routing table, but it didn't work and
I think it hosed linuxconf somehow.  Can anyone elaborate on setting up the
routing table ?


> sounds to me like the routeing table isn't set up corectly.
>
> >I really hope someone can help me cause IP Masqurading is apparently
> >what i need to do.
> >I was looking at the mini HOWTO on IPMasqurading, but it talks about
> >compiling the
> >kernal :( I have RedHat 5.2 with the 2.0.36 kernal. Can someone tell me
> >what i'm supposed to do?
> >Please.  I'm still very new and i wanna get both of my pcs connected to
> >the net with the one connection
> >But the linux box will not let me use the eth0 and the ppp0 at the same
> >time. If i have the eth0 active the
> >ppp0 will not work, and if the ppp0 is active the eth0 will not work.  I
> >am setting up everything
> >thru Xwindows cause i'm still fuzzy on all the command line stuff. All
> >the HOWTO's i read are based
> >off all the command line things which i dunno. Any way if anyone could
> >assist me with setting up
> >my 2 pcs to get connected to the net. Thank you very much in advanced.
> >
> >--
> >Charles "childsplay" VanDyke
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >ICQ# 14539920 ============
> >]TeamGameSpy[ ============
> >http://www.gamespy.com ===
> >
> >
>
>

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: "Ann Shaffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: write about networking
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 11:39:49 -0600

I'm editing a networking textbook for Course Technology, a major publisher
of computer books. This book is designed to prepare students for the
COMPTIA's Net+ certification exam, and covers a broad range of topics. The
author is Tamara Dean, of Berbee Consulting, in Madison, Wisconsin.

In order to make the information as meaningful as possible for rookie
networkers, we'd like to include "real-world stories" from practicing
professionals. We're looking for short (2 to 3 paragraph) accounts of events
in the life of a networking professional that underscore the need to master
the topics covered in the text. A typical story might go something like:
"Early one Monday morning a client called me in a panic because....."

We need stories for the following topics:

Networking Standards and the OSI Model
Network Protocols
Topology and Architecture
Transmission Media
Networking Hardware
WANs and Remote Connectivity
Networking with Windows NT
Networking with Novell NetWare
Maintaining and Upgrading the Network
Analyzing and Improving Network Performance
Ensuring Data Integrity and Availability
Managing Network Design and Implementation
Documentation and Standard Operating Procedures
Training and Support

We can pay $100 per story. One story will appear at the beginning of each
chapter, along with the writer's name and company.

If you're interested, please contact me via e-mail at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks a lot,
Ann Shaffer




------------------------------

From: "Nadeem Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: More 3c905b
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:17:32 -0500

I dont know about Slackware linux (I am a Newbie from NT world) but I am
using Redhat 5.1 on a 3c905b card with the 3c59x module and it works fine
with no errors. The same machine has WinNT on it (dual boot). No problems on
that to.
Check the following site for info on linux network drivers and 3com cards.
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html

Hope this helps.
Nadeem

Jason White wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I read the other posts about the 3c905b problems.  I'm dealing with
>Slackware and the same card.  I've seen the 3c9x.c (I think that's what
>the name of the piece of source code is), but I don't really know what
>to do with it.
>(If I could get this 905b card to work with the win98 machine, I would
>use its 3c905 --!b-- card in the linux box.  It boots without a single
>glitch)
>I tried rebuilding the kernel, but got sprayed with so many errors, I
>wouldn't even know where to start debugging.  So, I'm using the
>/sbin/modprobe 3c59x.  It just comes back and says that my card doesn't
>have support and I should edit rc.modules (which is where I load the
>module) or re-compile the kernel...Tried both...nothing doin'.
>
>What it boils down to is....If I get the code for the new driver, 1) How
>do I compile it? 2) Is it better to use modules or compile the kernel (I
>only have 16 MB RAM in this box, so I'm currently opting for modules)?
>3)Is there a URL/site with good directions/troubleshooting helps on
>re-compiling the kernel?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jason
>




------------------------------

From: "news.jf.intel.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can't ping Linux --> win98
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 10:12:54 -0800


Eriksson wrote in message ...
>When I try to configure the setting from "auto-detect" to "BNC
(coax)" I get
>the response "Your NIC is not connected to a BNC network" It doesn't
matter
>how high I shout "Yes it is!!" The comp doesn't get it... When I run
the
>program to auto-detect the network interface (what type of cable that
is
>used to connect the the network) I get the same error message.
>
>BUT! The cable works! I've used the same cable to another comp and it
woked
>fine. The 3com NIC also works. I installed it in my win 98 comp.
Works
>great!
>
>
>Thanx!
>

To get the 3c900 to detect cable correctly get a T connector and 2
termnators and attach them to the back of the NIC and change the
config again. You should not see the msg. again. It is some type of
cable test the card is doing and it is failing, dunno what causes it.
Hope this beats that one down for you. JM




------------------------------

From: Jason McKnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ISDN: What's a good adapter?
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 13:44:29 -0500

Get a netgear router instead. It is totally system independent so, it will
run with Windows, Linux, et al.

You will spend a little more money (total of about $300 US), but it is well
worth it.

BTW, Netgear has switched out the chips on their network cards. They might
not work out of the box now (like mine did), so you might look at 3Com if
you are not familiar with compiling new drivers.

Erica Vogle wrote:

> I'm thinking about going ISDN at home, and I was wondering what is a
> good ISDN modem for Linux?  I'm thinking about an 3ComImpact IQ External
>
> ISDN modem, but that's only because I know they make ISDN modems.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Brian


------------------------------

From: "Nadeem Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP on Compaq Presario notebook internal modem.
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:40:19 -0500

I have a compaq presaios 1650 notebook and I am trying to configure Linux to
dial out and connect to my ISP but it seems to me that Linux does not
recognise the integerated modem.

I am using Linuxconf to configure the PPP connection on Redhat 5.1. The
integrated modem is Compaq Presario 56k modem.

Thanks in advance.
Bye
Nadeem





------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Best books for Linux
Date: 16 Mar 1999 16:15:21 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In <7ch30f$afa$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thomas Lepkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>David Travers wrote:
>
>> What are the best reference books for Linux?
>>
>> Should deal with system admin in areas such as networking, sendmail ,
>> apache, firewall etc.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>
>LINUX Network Toolkit , Paul G. Sery, is pretty good step-by-step on
>setting up an office network.
>http://www.swcp.com/~pgsery/LNTK/
>

I second this recommendation. and Raise you one :)

RED HAT LINUX SECRETS.  if you can't find it in the one above, it is in this one
and vice versa.  Lots of things explained in this book as it is quite large.

chris
certified linux liteweight :)



>
>Also, read the book review section of the Linux Journal,
>http://www.linuxjournal.com/
>
>-TML
>
>


------------------------------

From: John Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compression Problem
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 09:40:36 -0500

gzip -d filename.tar.gz

You will still have to 'untar' it.

mech wrote:
> 
> Ok very new here ;)
> How do I uncompress a file that ends with .tar.gz
> 
> Not haveing any luck and it must be something very basic.
> 
> Please help.

-- 

-- john edwards
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   301.470.4805

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: "carrier" in ifconfig output
Date: 16 Mar 1999 15:02:07 GMT

Hello !!

What is the meaning of the "carrier" field 
in the output of ifconfig ?? I can't find any answer in my
local documentations, but perhaps somebody here does know it ???

Thanks in advance

Sebastian


=================

Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: "K.A. Steensma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Saw the answer but lost the message!
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:32:35 GMT

I saw someone answer as to why I get an error message on the 'alias
ppp-compress-26 slhc' but I can't find it now.  I think the answer was not
'slhc' but 'ppp_inflate' but I can be sure.  This is running on the 2.2.X
kernel.

Extracted from my '/etc/conf.modules' file:
    alias ppp-compress-21 bsd_comp
    alias ppp-compress-24 ppp_deflate
    alias ppp-compress-26 slhc

TIA Keith



------------------------------

From: Chad Eddings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: caching only dns & forwarders
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:38:50 +0000

Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> >
> 
> >Mar 15 17:07:27 cae-linux named[6522]: starting.  named 8.1.2 Thu Sep 24
> 
> So you are running named 8.1.2 - then named.boot is obsolete, put your
> forwarders and other options to named.conf.
> 
> leo

Thanks Leopold,

What is the syntax??

------------------------------

From: "¤ñ¥d¶W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NIC card not initializing
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:49:07 +0800

have you ran lilo   before reboot ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ¼¶¼g©ó¤å³¹ <7ckl6k$7a7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Greetings all,
>
>I'm trying to connect my Linux Box to a TCP/IP network. I have a 486DX4 100
>with 32MB RAM, DTC 2278E controller, ATI Mach32, and an ISA SMC Elite
>Ultra Network card (83C790QF Chipset). I tried using the Kernel
>configuration utility under Xwindows. I chose the SMC Ultra module, and
>configured the card properly. I then used the Network configuration utility
>to setup the ip addresses, net mask, etc. The card did not initialize
during
>lilo boot. I also tried "ifconfig -a", with no output. I then swapped the
>card with a new 3COM Etherlink III card and ran the configuration utilities
>again. The same thing happens. I then typed "cat /some directory/proc" to
>check for address conflicts, there was none. I also can't find eth0 in the
>/dev directory. The HOWTO documents says to recompile the kernel to use the
>ethernet modules. The documents says to untar the kernel source file in
>"/usr/src" and run make config or make menuconfig. I don't see any kernel
tar
>files and "make config" yielded an error. How can I recompile the kernel
>to use the ethernet module? Any help would beappreciated?
>
>Thank You,
>
>James
>
>P.S. I also inserted, "append eth0=10, 0x300" in lilo.conf. Nothing happens
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vincent Fox)
Subject: Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help
Date: 16 Mar 1999 11:18:30 -0500

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

*snip*

I think you are all dismissing his point too lightly.
I have been a UNIX sysadmin since 1990. I have used many
of the major variants of commercial UNIX from my early BSD
days with SunOS up through currently being surrounded with
mostly SysV systems like IRIX and Solaris. I have dabbled
my toe in Linux every now and then. Last month I decided I
was going to get serious about Linux and cleared out my office
except for one Celeron PC on which I was going to load Mandrake
and since it was my office PC I would be sitting in front of
it everyday and thus be forcing myself to learn it.

Installing and getting it basically up and running was fairly
simple. However, as I dove into more complex things than just
getting an X-Windows box, like PPP dialup and sound, things got
hairy quickly. Merely finding the documentation I needed was a
trial. The Documentation people are light-years behind the
kernel people. So while we have very excellent code in 2.2.3
the docs will be from 2.0 quite often, and you end up reading
the source code to figure things out. I am still struggling to
get my Creative SB PCI64 to work correctly. Doing a web search
always seemed to result in so many hits that I was drowned in
trying to search for the needle in the haystack of postings that
were about something close to what I was doing, but not exactly.

Linux is like any other UNIX. It does certain things frighteningly
well, like for instance not having to be rebooted every day :-)
Friendly, no. I like KDE, but it is closer to CDE than to MSWindows
despite some nods in the MS direction. The rest of the OS is a
bit of a mish-mash of things. For instance in Redhat, there seems
to be a blend of startup methodology. In /etc/rc.d/ you have some
elements of SysV-style startups. Yet mixed in there is some BSD
mentality, for instance /etc/rc.d/rc.serial to set serial ports
instead of putting them in the /etc/rc.d/rc#.d run level startups.
Geez, make up your mind people! I hated it when I first started
playing with HPUX and had to remember that on THIS variant, it's
not /etc/fstab it's /etc/checklist, etc.

It's strength I think is it's background from a mainframe
environment. It's a design for many users that is making it's
way DOWN to the desktop. NT on the other hand is trying to evolve
it's way from the single-user desktop upward, and is having a lot
of problems trying to keep it's reptilian brain compatibility.
To borrow a line from Star Trek, it's much easier for a civilized
man to act as a barbarian than a barbarian to act civilized.

I love UNIX I truly do, but you are going to have many people
including me, who expect Linux to not only do UNIX well, which
it does, but also do PC stuff well, which it doesn't. Like I said
I shouldn't expect any variant of UNIX to do sound stuff well, but
yet I find myself inexplicably frustrated at for example the very
limited sound support in Linux. And I should know better.

-- 
        "Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft"?
         -- Christine Comaford, PC Week, 27/9/95

------------------------------

From: "K.A. Steensma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: PAP problems
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:05:09 GMT

Go get this and run the script.  It will setup everything correctly IF you have
the right info that it asks for in the script.

ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/network/serial/ppp

KAS

hASCII wrote:

> Hi there !
> When I try to connect to my ISP the PAP authentication fails.
> May the login name / the passwort be too long ?
> What else might be wrong ?
> Thanks in Advance
>         Markus
>
> /var/log/messages
> ipppd[3313]: PHASE_WAIT -> PHASE_ESTABLISHED, ifunit: 0, linkunit: 0,
> fd: 8
> ipppd[3313]: sent [0][LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic 0x758376ff>]
> ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][LCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00> <mru 1524> <auth
> chap md5> <MPmrru 0x5f4> <MPdiscr: 0x3
> ipppd[3313]: sent [0][LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00> <MPmrru 0x5f4>]
> ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic 0x758376ff>]
> ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1524> <auth chap md5>
> <MPdiscr: 0x3 [ 00 c0 7b 53 4f 46 ]>]
> ipppd[3313]: sent [0][LCP ConfNak id=0x2 <auth pap>]
> ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <mru 1524> <auth pap> <MPdiscr:
> 0x3 [ 00 c0 7b 53 4f 46 ]>]
> ipppd[3313]: sent [0][LCP ConfAck id=0x3 <mru 1524> <auth pap> <MPdiscr:
> 0x3 [ 00 c0 7b 53 4f 46 ]>]
> ipppd[3313]: lcp layer is UP
> ipppd[3313]: sent [0][PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="longerusername"
> password="longpasswort"]
> ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][PAP AuthNak id=0x1msg="Authentication
> failure\015\012"]
> ipppd[3313]: Remote message: Authentication failure^M
> ipppd[3313]: PAP authentication failed
> ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][LCP TermReq id=0x4]
> ipppd[3313]: LCP terminated by peer
>
> /etc/ppp/options.ippp0
> # The IP addresses: <local>:<remote>
> # just "0.0.0.0:" or nothing for dynamic IP
> # 0.0.0.0:
>
> debug
> +pwlog
>
> # my user name (only for PAP!)
> user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> # my system name (only for CHAP!)
> # name "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> /etc/pap-secrets
> # client             server          pw         iplist
> "longusername"    *       "longpassword"


------------------------------

From: Paul Godward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: Re: more samba problems
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 09:57:00 -0800

I found a really good resource called Diagnosing Your Samba Server at
http://gd.tuwien.ac.at:8020/samba/docs/DIAGNOSIS.html

It really helped me get SAMBA up and running

Hope this helps.
Paul

D E G wrote:

> i've been trying for the last month to setup samba, between my rh5.2 and
> win95 machines, to no avail.
>
> everything looks correct on the linux side (i bought the samba book and
> have been reading the newsgroups) so my current theory is that my win95
> box isn't setup correctly.
>
> so, my question is: how should my windows box be setup? (ie what
> networking clients, what settings for tcp/ip and file sharing, etc...)
>
> any help would be appreciated.
>
> D E G
>
> --
>
> Remove "_nospam_" to reply.
> Sorry for the inconvenience, but desperate times call for desperate
> measures.


------------------------------

From: Dan Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Kernel HOWTO accuracy?
Date: 16 Mar 1999 19:15:39 GMT

In alt.os.linux Walter L. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I thinking of trying out the new kernel.
: (2.2.3)

: How accurate is the current kernel
: howto? The one I found on the Metalab
: (sunsite) site is dated late May 1997.

If you don't know how to install a kernel, the HOWTO will work.
However recent information can be found in the Documentation directory
of the kernel source tree.

-- 
           Dan Nguyen            | It is with true love as it is with ghosts;
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]         | everyone talks of it, but few have seen it.
http://www.cse.msu.edu/~nguyend7 |                    -La Rochefocauld, Maxims


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to