In generally, you want to put your most frequently used partitions
closer to the front.  Read and Write speed can be 2-3x faster at the
front of a disk than at end.
I generally go for:

/boot   (near front of disk for historical reasons, old
       BIOS's or booters)
swap   (especially if you actually "swap")
/      (static system files)
/var+tmp   (I usually make /tmp a pointer to /var/tmp2 -- they are both
      written to frequently and I figure if a crash corrupts something
      during a write command, it'll likely stay confined to 1 partition
/var/cache   #have a separate partition for squid to be happy with with
      it being located on my fastest disk to optimize web-browsing
      speed which is the slowest operation on my disk -- it being
      the slowest could also be an argument for putting it on a
      slower disk, though, as well -- but if something is in the cache
      it will speed it up, and since squid often writes to the cache
      to keep it up-to-date, I like it to be fast -- note -- I set
      all browser disk caches on all systems to as small as possible
      so they will use the squid cache more often -- with my laptop,
      for example, it's often faster to read or write something to
      a network disk than to a local disk (go figure).
/home   Yeah...email, source, compiling is all here, but I think the
      system files will oft be read more than /home files

I currently use xfs with 'noatime,nodiratime,async,numbufs=8'. XFS is
best on large media files, Reiserfs is better at small files but seems
to have more stability problems. I also set the 'inode' size on XFS
during file creation based on content -- I think default is 256 bytes.
However if you use the max-block size default (4k on x86 systems), your minimum file will take 4K, but you can set inode sizes up to 1/2 the
block size (or 2K on x86 systems) and the file system will store small directories, link information and maybe (not sure) small file data content in the inode itself thus allowing for small file storage in
the inode and no need for a separate seek to a data block (which would
be 4k in size) to read a small amount of data.


Also, xfs tries to delay writes above and beyond what the kernel does
in it's elevator algorithms so it can know what size space to look for
when looking for free space.  So if you copy data around using 'tar' or
'dd', using a high blocking value of 1-2 meg will help optimize file
layout when copying large files.  It uses a B-tree to store pointers
to sorted-by-size areas of the disk for fast allocation.

It supports multiple streams of data for a file that are useable to implement arbitrary system attributes as well as user-defined attributes. System attributes are often used for security labeling under some OS's (Trusted Irix and some flavors of linux).

XFS was designed/optimized for real-time read/write of large video datastreams to disk for the entertainment industry, making it ideal for streaming or recording realtime video. It supports formatting to directly make use of RAID disks so file striping will be optimally laid out for a specific RAID configuration - it also has support (still experimental, I believe, in Linux) for real-time partitions to allow for ultra fast read/writes without going through the file system block allocation layer (not that the average user would have a need for this).

Personally I just like the fact that I can make inodes up to 512-2048 in size to hold small bits of data that would otherwise take up to an extra 4k block on disk.

XFS comes with a file-system re-organizer that runs by default in the
wee hours to assure optimal tuning. The original design didn't require this, but some important customer had some degenerate case that could result in atypical fragmentation -- so the re-organizer runs in passes
at night, then it marks where it left off organizing when it quits for the night so when it restarts the next night, it starts organizing where it left off -- assuring that large terabyte disks are eventually "worked through", instead of only reorganizing the start of such a partition for 2-3 hours each night.


It generally outperforms or equals performance of most of the
journalling file systems except (in the last benchmarks I saw)
doing "rm"/unlinks of many small files. I would guess this has to
do with 'free-space' combining that likely goes on during deletion
to ensure that contiguous free blocks are marked as single larger
blocks than multiple smaller blocks. On my "/Share" partition that
I put files to 'share' on my internal network (like latest SuSE
rpm's, Perl CPAN source, Music or Pictures), the freespace layout
is listed as follows:
xfs_admin> freesp
from to extents blocks pct
1 1 188 188 0.00
2 3 256 517 0.00
4 7 46 224 0.00
8 15 42 486 0.00
16 31 53 1300 0.01
32 63 61 2944 0.01
64 127 111 10226 0.05
128 255 144 26433 0.13
256 511 156 58786 0.29
512 1023 180 131136 0.64
1024 2047 186 272879 1.33
2048 4095 95 265112 1.30
4096 8191 58 347540 1.70
8192 16383 29 342561 1.67
16384 32767 80 1961066 9.58
32768 65535 11 524764 2.56
65536 131071 11 1020952 4.99
131072 262143 7 1321298 6.46
262144 524287 14 5959340 29.12
524288 1048576 12 8214071 40.14
---------
It tries to keep free space organized into the largest extents possible, which would explain extra cpu overhead on deleting many small files as their space is consolidated into larger and larger extents.



If you have more than one hard disk, put your swap and OS on that disk. My "Share" partition is on one of my large but slower IDE devices. I use an even larger (and cheaper) 250G drive for daily backups....

-linda



mike wrote:

Hello,
I have installed linux a few times no real problems with my
installs. But going to move some drives around and do a fresh
install. I usually install with the below

/
swap
/boot
/var
/usr
/home
/tmp

I use ext3 and I am currently useing Mandrake distribution on an
intel compatible machine with ide drives.

My question is does the order I create the partitions matter and if
so what would be the proper order, if there is one?


Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

Reply via email to