Greetings!

I have 2 machines; this one, a W98 box and my linux 2.0.31 box. Both are
joined in holy matrimony by a KTI DEC 21143 wannabe (PCI) with a twisted
pair crossover.
All I really wish to do is get my linux box to be able to see files on
this machine and copy/transfer them over locally. I don't care if W98
can see/use the linux box. So, which protocol is better? IPX or TCP/IP?
IPX seems a no-brainer to config under W98 whereas TCP wants all sorts
of parameters and settings...additionally, setting up an IP for this
machine seems to confilct with the dialup settings I have. Don't know
why, as I have one setting bound to the dial up adapter and another
bound to the eth. card.
So, I'm after people's experiences. Would IPX be better for what I want
to do? I don't want to masquerade or anything like that, just be able to
have linux see this machine and copy files from here.
This machine is called Angela
The linux box is Peter (hostname)
And the workgroup is Azenomei
These are settings for W98...
With this is mind, how do you get linux to recognise the name of the
Angela machine and the workgroup name? Or is that neither here nor there
under linux?
Additionally, Redhat found my eth card upon setup and installed Tulip
drivers for it..if I stat /dev/eth0 I get can't stat errors. How do I
interrogate the card? I.e, bounce packets to/from it to see if all's
well?
Sorry for the long-windedness...
In short, what's better? IPX or TCP/IP?
Any help appreciated!
'Later
--
Visit my online world! (NEW MAPS!)
http://www.ticnet.com/azenomei/fels/fels.html
Zimbabwe Pages Coming Soon!
http://www.ticnet.com/azenomei/zimbabwe/zimbabwe.html
Remove the SPAM/TRASH to reply...(Usenet posts only)
Cybiades-- Computing for fun!

Reply via email to