I like your idea. :)


[Jerome Tan]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backup E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.skyinet.net/users/jt888/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=pgpkey0
ICQ=1850588

-----Original Message-----
From: Peeyush Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: reds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jerome Tan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, August 26, 1998 2:04 AM
Subject: RE: stratgy for Linux


> Ok, I'm going to start by saying that Linux is a GREAT O/S.  I think that
>people should adapt what Windows has, TO AN EXTENT.  I think that linux
>should keeps it's features.  I also think that someone that is a developer
>and has the guts and the time to do so, should start a linux-user-firendly
>project.  If Linux had the INTERFACE of Windows, WITHOUT the Core of
>WindBLOWZ, it would work out.  I think that the Windows 98 GUI is Great,
>but, the CORE of MS-DOS, Win 3.11, Win95, and Win98 SUX!  WinNT isn't that
>much far off (the dreaded blue screen and the 128MB memory Dump)!  I think
>Microshaft did i good job on the User Interface, but failed on the
Technical
>portion of the Core, for that they had to rely on hasty business tactics.
>If Linux were to adapt the Windows GUI and someone that is a GOOD
developer,
>built a nice Core to the X Server...It would all work out!  Now that cable
>modems are out almost every where, xDSL, and ISDN (altough it's almost a
>dead technology)...Downloading Linux wouldn't be much of a hassle!  It
>wouldn't take NEARLY as much time!
>
>
>-Regards
>Peeyush Singh
>BooLeaN
>
>

Reply via email to