Hi,
The subject was Seagate HDD.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote[in part]:
> I wouldn't even try a RH install with 4mb.
> with 8b I would still expect lots of trouble.
Well, here is a problem.
If so, where is the so much claimed Linux superiority?
On a 386 with 4mb I run Win3.11 with Word 6 and Exell 5, Adobe photoshop
2.0 ,and it worked fine (slow, of course, but it worked).
Can I run X and X-applications on 386 with 4mb? Of course,not.
What stays? Linux is better because is quite gratis. Nothing else.
I understand you can make the best server using Linux. But you can not
call something "Operating System " only for this reason.
When you try to do something for the mass-use you are going in the same
direction as Microsoft: see KDE and Gnome.As a gratis product Linux has
no resposability for the client, and this is the only reason Linux has
not (yet) the problem of the compatibility with the past (which makes so
much trobule at Microsoft).
Regards,
Cristian
