Hi Andreas,
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:47:30 +0200, Andreas Rohner wrote:
> This bug leads to reproducible silent data loss, despite the use of
> msync(), sync() and a clean unmount of the file system. It is easily
> reproducible with the following script:
>
> ----------------[BEGIN SCRIPT]--------------------
> mkfs.nilfs2 -f /dev/sdb
> mount /dev/sdb /mnt
>
> # create 30MB testfile
> dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=30 of=/mnt/testfile
>
> umount /mnt
> mount /dev/sdb /mnt
> CHECKSUM_BEFORE="$(md5sum /mnt/testfile)"
>
> # simple tool that opens /mnt/testfile and
> # writes a few blocks using mmap at a 5MB offset
> /root/mmaptest/mmaptest /mnt/testfile 30 10 5
>
> sync
> CHECKSUM_AFTER="$(md5sum /mnt/testfile)"
> umount /mnt
> mount /dev/sdb /mnt
> CHECKSUM_AFTER_REMOUNT="$(md5sum /mnt/testfile)"
> umount /mnt
>
> echo "BEFORE MMAP:\t$CHECKSUM_BEFORE"
> echo "AFTER MMAP:\t$CHECKSUM_AFTER"
> echo "AFTER REMOUNT:\t$CHECKSUM_AFTER_REMOUNT"
> ----------------[END SCRIPT]--------------------
>
> The mmaptest tool looks something like this (very simplified, with
> error checking removed):
>
> ----------------[BEGIN mmaptest]--------------------
> data = mmap(NULL, file_size - file_offset, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_SHARED, fd, file_offset);
>
> for (i = 0; i < write_count; ++i) {
> memcpy(data + i * 4096, buf, sizeof(buf));
> msync(data, file_size - file_offset, MS_SYNC))
> }
> ----------------[END mmaptest]--------------------
>
> The output of the script looks something like this:
>
> BEFORE MMAP: 281ed1d5ae50e8419f9b978aab16de83 /mnt/testfile
> AFTER MMAP: 6604a1c31f10780331a6850371b3a313 /mnt/testfile
> AFTER REMOUNT: 281ed1d5ae50e8419f9b978aab16de83 /mnt/testfile
>
> So it is clear, that the changes done using mmap() do not survive a
> remount. This can be reproduced a 100% of the time. The problem was
> introduced with the following commit:
>
> 136e877 nilfs2: fix issue of nilfs_set_page_dirty() for page at EOF
> boundary
>
> If the page was read with mpage_readpage() or mpage_readpages() for
> example, then it has no buffers attached to it. In that case
> page_has_buffers(page) in nilfs_set_page_dirty() will be false.
> Therefore nilfs_set_file_dirty() is never called and the pages are never
> collected and never written to disk.
>
> This patch fixes the problem by also calling nilfs_set_file_dirty() if
> the page has no buffers attached to it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rohner <andreas.roh...@gmx.net>
> ---
> fs/nilfs2/inode.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
> index 6252b17..9e3c525 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
> @@ -219,10 +219,10 @@ static int nilfs_writepage(struct page *page, struct
> writeback_control *wbc)
>
> static int nilfs_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
> {
> + struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> int ret = __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
>
> if (page_has_buffers(page)) {
> - struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> unsigned nr_dirty = 0;
> struct buffer_head *bh, *head;
>
> @@ -245,6 +245,10 @@ static int nilfs_set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
>
> if (nr_dirty)
> nilfs_set_file_dirty(inode, nr_dirty);
> + } else if (ret) {
> + unsigned nr_dirty = 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - inode->i_blkbits);
> +
> + nilfs_set_file_dirty(inode, nr_dirty);
> }
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.1.0
Thank you for reporting this issue.
I'd like to look into this patch, it looks to point out an important
regression, but it may take some time since I am quite busy this week..
Ryusuke Konishi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
