On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 14:00 -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.ve...@intel.com > > wrote: > > On 01/06, Dan Williams wrote: > > > * The 'ndctl list' command awkwardly prints out all the > > > corresponding > > > device-dax information when a namespace is in 'dax' mode. > > > Conversely if > > > someone is only interested in listing device-dax information > > > they need to > > > contend with libnvdimm data. > > > > > > Introduce a separate daxctl utility with its own 'list' command > > > for this > > > purpose, and make the listing of device-dax data through 'ndctl > > > list' > > > optional (new --device-dax option). > > > > the 'rpmbuild' script was failing as the new daxctl utility wasn't > > included in %files in the spec. The following patch fixes that. > > > > 8<----- > > > > From d26a582b4ae9e69a22e52908a5d4bbae0a79717f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > > 2001 > > From: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.ve...@intel.com> > > Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:52:34 -0700 > > Subject: [PATCH] spec: add the new daxctl binary to the spec file > > > > The missing binary was triggering the "installed but unpackaged file > > found" check for rpmbuild. Add daxctl to the %files section as we do > > want it to be packaged. > > Yes, we do want it packaged, but in it's own rpm. I have patch to add > that as well as a daxctl man page.
Ah ok - I thought it would just get installed as a part of the ndctl rpm. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
