On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Logan Gunthorpe <log...@deltatee.com> wrote: > > > On 27/02/17 09:56 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >> Yes please, that is way too subtle. Suggest: >> >> NOTE: Callers must assume that userspace was able to open the cdev and >> can call cdev fops callbacks at any time, even if this function fails. >> >> I would also add a note to cdev_device_del: >> >> NOTE: This guarantees that associated sysfs callbacks are not running >> or runnable, however any open cdevs will remain and their fops remain >> callable even after this returns. >> >> Since I have seen a lot of confusion on that point as well.. > > Sure, I'll add that verbiage to a v3 sometime after rc1.
It would also be great to patch1 into a stable non-rebasing git tree so it can be used as a baseline for other 4.12 targeted development. The device-dax patches in particular collide with some pending development. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
