On 07/24/2018 12:36 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> In preparation for using set_memory_uc() instead set_memory_np() for
>> isolating poison from speculation, teach the memtype code to sanitize
>> physical addresses vs __PHYSICAL_MASK.
>>
>> The motivation for using set_memory_uc() for this case is to allow
>> ongoing access to persistent memory pages via the pmem-driver +
>> memcpy_mcsafe() until the poison is repaired.
>>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <h...@zytor.com>
>> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.l...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
>> Cc: <linux-e...@vger.kernel.org>
>> Cc: <x...@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
>> index 1555bd7d3449..6788ffa990f8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
>> @@ -512,6 +512,17 @@ static int free_ram_pages_type(u64 start, u64 end)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static u64 sanitize_phys(u64 address)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * When changing the memtype for pages containing poison allow
>> + * for a "decoy" virtual address (bit 63 clear) passed to
>> + * set_memory_X(). __pa() on a "decoy" address results in a
>> + * physical address with it 63 set.
>> + */
>> + return address & __PHYSICAL_MASK;
>
> s/it/bit
Thanks Ingo! I'll update when I pull in the patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvdimm mailing list
> Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
