On 2018-09-25 11:33 a.m., Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> +    /*
>> +     * p2pdma mappings are not compatible with devices that use
>> +     * dma_virt_ops. If the upper layers do the right thing
>> +     * this should never happen because it will be prevented
>> +     * by the check in pci_p2pdma_add_client()
>> +     */
>> +    if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_VIRT_OPS) &&
>> +                     dev->dma_ops == &dma_virt_ops))
>> +            return 0;
> 
> Are you assuming that the compiler will optimize out the dev->dma_ops
> == &dma_virt_ops test if CONFIG_DMA_VIRT_OPS=n such that no reference to the
> dma_virt_ops symbol appears in the object file? Are you sure all compilers
> and compiler versions that are used to build the Linux kernel will do that?

Hmm, I can't say for certain but I would definitely expect any sane
compiler to do so. It's a fairly obvious optimization and the kbuild
robot is happy with it.

I just did a test compile on 4.9 (which is the earliest compiler version
I have readily available) and it worked fine. The minimum gcc the kernel
supports is 4.6 right now.

I've also done a similar test on godbolt.org[1] and can't find any
compiler version that doesn't work.

Logan


[1] https://godbolt.org/z/d5Mhee
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Reply via email to