Hello, On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 03:05:17PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > I am using unbound workqueues. However there isn't an interface that > exposes the NUMA bits of them directly. All I am doing with this > patch is adding "queue_work_near" which takes a NUMA node as an > argument and then copies the logic of "queue_work_on" with the > exception that I am doing a check to verify that there is an > intersection between wq_unbound_cpumask and the cpumask of the node, > and then passing a CPU from that intersection into "__queue_work".
Can it just take a cpu id and not feed that to __queue_work()? That looks like a lot of extra logic. Thanks. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm