On 2018-11-13 at 05:02 Pankaj Gupta <pagu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> As this patch is dependent on PageReserved patch(which is in progress), just 
> wondering if we are able to test the code path for hugepage with DAX.

For testing, I used the following patch.  It's not 100%, since it
intercepts at kvm_is_reserved_pfn(), and not PageReserved() directly.
The only difference is with kvm_set_pfn_dirty() I think.

I also have a nasty module that would dump the EPT's and the host page
table's mappings so I could confirm that the huge pages are being mapped
correctly.

-----------------------
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 2679e476b6c3..1b394a0752a0 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -148,6 +148,10 @@ __weak int kvm_arch_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct 
kvm *kvm,
 
 bool kvm_is_reserved_pfn(kvm_pfn_t pfn)
 {
+       // XXX hack
+       if (is_zone_device_page(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
+               return false;
+
        if (pfn_valid(pfn))
                return PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn));
 
-----------------------

Thanks,

Barret

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Reply via email to