On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 01:33:27PM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 04:28:35PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:20:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:27:42AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > > ----- On Apr 3, 2019, at 9:32 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:34:07AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > > >> ----- On Apr 2, 2019, at 11:23 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com 
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:14:40AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > > >> >> ----- On Apr 2, 2019, at 10:28 AM, paulmck paul...@linux.ibm.com 
> > > > >> >> wrote:
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> > Hello!
> > > > >> >> > 
> > > > >> >> > This series prohibits use of DEFINE_SRCU() and 
> > > > >> >> > DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU()
> > > > >> >> > by loadable modules.  The reason for this prohibition is the 
> > > > >> >> > fact
> > > > >> >> > that using these two macros within modules requires that the 
> > > > >> >> > size of
> > > > >> >> > the reserved region be increased, which is not something we 
> > > > >> >> > want to
> > > > >> >> > be doing all that often.  Instead, loadable modules should 
> > > > >> >> > define an
> > > > >> >> > srcu_struct and invoke init_srcu_struct() from their 
> > > > >> >> > module_init function
> > > > >> >> > and cleanup_srcu_struct() from their module_exit function.  
> > > > >> >> > Note that
> > > > >> >> > modules using call_srcu() will also need to invoke 
> > > > >> >> > srcu_barrier() from
> > > > >> >> > their module_exit function.
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> This arbitrary API limitation seems weird.
> > > > >> >> 
> > > > >> >> Isn't there a way to allow modules to use DEFINE_SRCU and 
> > > > >> >> DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU
> > > > >> >> while implementing them with dynamic allocation under the hood ?
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > Although call_srcu() already has initialization hooks, some would
> > > > >> > also be required in srcu_read_lock(), and I am concerned about 
> > > > >> > adding
> > > > >> > memory allocation at that point, especially given the possibility
> > > > >> > of memory-allocation failure.  And the possibility that the first
> > > > >> > srcu_read_lock() happens in an interrupt handler or similar.
> > > > >> > 
> > > > >> > Or am I missing a trick here?
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> I was more thinking that under #ifdef MODULE, both DEFINE_SRCU and
> > > > >> DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU could append data in a dedicated section. module.c
> > > > >> would additionally lookup that section on module load, and deal with
> > > > >> those statically defined SRCU entries as if they were dynamically
> > > > >> allocated ones. It would of course cleanup those resources on module
> > > > >> unload.
> > > > >> 
> > > > >> Am I missing some subtlety there ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > If I understand you correctly, that is actually what is already done. 
> > > > >  The
> > > > > size of this dedicated section is currently set by 
> > > > > PERCPU_MODULE_RESERVE,
> > > > > and the additions of DEFINE{_STATIC}_SRCU() in modules was requiring 
> > > > > that
> > > > > this to be increased frequently.  That led to a request that something
> > > > > be done, in turn leading to this patch series.
> > > > 
> > > > I think we are not expressing quite the same idea.
> > > > 
> > > > AFAIU, yours is to have DEFINE*_SRCU directly define per-cpu data 
> > > > within modules,
> > > > which ends up using percpu module reserved memory.
> > > > 
> > > > My idea is to make DEFINE*_SRCU have a different behavior under #ifdef 
> > > > MODULE.
> > > > It could emit a _global variable_ (_not_ per-cpu) within a new section. 
> > > > That
> > > > section would then be used by module init/exit code to figure out what 
> > > > "srcu
> > > > descriptors" are present in the modules. It would therefore rely on 
> > > > dynamic
> > > > allocation for those, therefore removing the need to involve the percpu 
> > > > module
> > > > reserved pool at all.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't see a way around this short of changing module loading to do
> > > > > alloc_percpu() and then updating the relocation based on this result.
> > > > > Which would admittedly be far more convenient.  I was assuming that
> > > > > this would be difficult due to varying CPU offsets or the like.
> > > > > 
> > > > > But if it can be done reasonably, it would be quite a bit nicer than
> > > > > forcing dynamic allocation in cases where it is not otherwise needed.
> > > > 
> > > > Hopefully my explanation above helps clear out what I have in mind.
> > > > 
> > > > You can find similar tricks performed by include/linux/tracepoint.h:
> > > > 
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PREL32_RELOCATIONS
> > > > static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t 
> > > > *p)
> > > > {
> > > >         return offset_to_ptr(p);
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > #define __TRACEPOINT_ENTRY(name)                                        
> > > > \
> > > >         asm("   .section \"__tracepoints_ptrs\", \"a\"          \n"     
> > > > \
> > > >             "   .balign 4                                       \n"     
> > > > \
> > > >             "   .long   __tracepoint_" #name " - .              \n"     
> > > > \
> > > >             "   .previous                                       \n")
> > > > #else
> > > > static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t 
> > > > *p)
> > > > {
> > > >         return *p;
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > #define __TRACEPOINT_ENTRY(name)                                        
> > > >  \
> > > >         static tracepoint_ptr_t __tracepoint_ptr_##name __used          
> > > >  \
> > > >         __attribute__((section("__tracepoints_ptrs"))) =                
> > > >  \
> > > >                 &__tracepoint_##name
> > > > #endif
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > > #define DEFINE_TRACE_FN(name, reg, unreg)                               
> > > >  \
> > > >         static const char __tpstrtab_##name[]                           
> > > >  \
> > > >         __attribute__((section("__tracepoints_strings"))) = #name;      
> > > >  \
> > > >         struct tracepoint __tracepoint_##name                           
> > > >  \
> > > >         __attribute__((section("__tracepoints"), used)) =               
> > > >  \
> > > >                 { __tpstrtab_##name, STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE, reg, unreg, 
> > > > NULL };\
> > > >         __TRACEPOINT_ENTRY(name);
> > > > 
> > > > And kernel/module.c:
> > > > 
> > > > find_module_sections():
> > > > 
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
> > > >         mod->tracepoints_ptrs = section_objs(info, "__tracepoints_ptrs",
> > > >                                              
> > > > sizeof(*mod->tracepoints_ptrs),
> > > >                                              &mod->num_tracepoints);
> > > > #endif
> > > > 
> > > > And kernel/tracepoint.c:tracepoint_module_notify() for the module 
> > > > coming/going
> > > > notifier.
> > > > 
> > > > Basically you would want to have your own structure within your own 
> > > > section of
> > > > the module which describes the srcu domain, and have a module 
> > > > coming/going
> > > > notifier responsible for dynamically allocating the srcu domain on 
> > > > "coming", and
> > > > doing a srcu barrier and cleanup the domain on "going".
> > > 
> > > Ah, sounds like an excellent approach!  I will give it a shot, thank you!
> > 
> > Please see below for an untested shot.
> > 
> > The original commits posted in this series are still available within
> > the -srcu tree at branch srcunomod.2019.04.05a.  Yes, I am a digital
> > packrat.  Why do you ask?
> > 
> > Thoughts?  Or more accurately, given that this is the first time I
> > have used linker sections, what did I mess up?
> > 
> >                                                     Thanx, Paul
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > commit e24a0dab1414c563bb96bcb28d5963c9df18b1e8
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.ibm.com>
> > Date:   Fri Apr 5 16:15:00 2019 -0700
> > 
> >     srcu: Allocate per-CPU data for DEFINE_SRCU() in modules
> >     
> >     Adding DEFINE_SRCU() or DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() to a loadable module 
> > requires
> >     that the size of the reserved region be increased, which is not 
> > something
> >     we want to be doing all that often.  One approach would be to require
> >     that loadable modules define an srcu_struct and invoke 
> > init_srcu_struct()
> >     from their module_init function and cleanup_srcu_struct() from their
> >     module_exit function.  However, this is more than a bit user unfriendly.
> >     
> >     This commit therefore creates an ___srcu_struct_ptrs linker section,
> >     and pointers to srcu_struct structures created by DEFINE_SRCU() and
> >     DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() within a module are placed into that module's
> >     ___srcu_struct_ptrs section.  The required init_srcu_struct() and
> >     cleanup_srcu_struct() functions are then automatically invoked as needed
> >     when that module is loaded and unloaded, thus allowing modules to 
> > continue
> >     to use DEFINE_SRCU() and DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU() while avoiding the need
> >     to increase the size of the reserved region.
> >     
> >     Many of the algorithms and some of the code was cheerfully cherry-picked
> >     from other code making use of linker sections, perhaps most notably from
> >     tracepoints.  All bugs are nevertheless the sole property of the author.
> >     
> >     Suggested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h 
> > b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > index f8f6f04c4453..c2d919a1566e 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > @@ -338,6 +338,10 @@
> >             KEEP(*(__tracepoints_ptrs)) /* Tracepoints: pointer array */ \
> >             __stop___tracepoints_ptrs = .;                          \
> >             *(__tracepoints_strings)/* Tracepoints: strings */      \
> > +           . = ALIGN(8);                                           \
> > +           __start___srcu_struct = .;                              \
> > +           *(___srcu_struct_ptrs)                                  \
> > +           __end___srcu_struct = .;                                \
> >     }                                                               \
> >                                                                     \
> >     .rodata1          : AT(ADDR(.rodata1) - LOAD_OFFSET) {          \
> > diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> > index 5bf5dcd91009..921443a026dd 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/module.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/rbtree_latch.h>
> >  #include <linux/error-injection.h>
> >  #include <linux/tracepoint-defs.h>
> > +#include <linux/srcu.h>
> >  
> >  #include <linux/percpu.h>
> >  #include <asm/module.h>
> > @@ -448,6 +449,10 @@ struct module {
> >     unsigned int num_tracepoints;
> >     tracepoint_ptr_t *tracepoints_ptrs;
> >  #endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_SRCU
> > +   unsigned int num_srcu_structs;
> > +   struct srcu_struct **srcu_struct_ptrs;
> > +#endif
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS
> >     unsigned int num_bpf_raw_events;
> >     struct bpf_raw_event_map *bpf_raw_events;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/srcutree.h b/include/linux/srcutree.h
> > index 7f7c8c050f63..93685a9f3b4c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/srcutree.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/srcutree.h
> > @@ -120,9 +120,17 @@ struct srcu_struct {
> >   *
> >   * See include/linux/percpu-defs.h for the rules on per-CPU variables.
> >   */
> > -#define __DEFINE_SRCU(name, is_static)                                     
> > \
> > -   static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_data, name##_srcu_data);\
> > -   is_static struct srcu_struct name = __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name, 
> > name##_srcu_data)
> > +#ifdef MODULE
> > +# define __DEFINE_SRCU(name, is_static)                                    
> > \
> > +   is_static struct srcu_struct name;                              \
> > +   struct srcu_struct *__srcu_struct_##name                        \
> > +           __attribute__((section("___srcu_struct_ptrs"))) = &name
> 
> This can be replaced by:
> __section("__srcu_struct_ptrs") = &name;

That is way easier on the eyes!  Thank you, will fix.

> > +#else
> > +# define __DEFINE_SRCU(name, is_static)                                    
> > \
> > +   static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct srcu_data, name##_srcu_data);      \
> > +   is_static struct srcu_struct name =                             \
> > +           __SRCU_STRUCT_INIT(name, name##_srcu_data)
> > +#endif
> >  #define DEFINE_SRCU(name)          __DEFINE_SRCU(name, /* not static */)
> >  #define DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(name)   __DEFINE_SRCU(name, static)
> >  
> > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> > index 0b9aa8ab89f0..524da609c884 100644
> > --- a/kernel/module.c
> > +++ b/kernel/module.c
> > @@ -3093,6 +3093,11 @@ static int find_module_sections(struct module *mod, 
> > struct load_info *info)
> >                                          sizeof(*mod->tracepoints_ptrs),
> >                                          &mod->num_tracepoints);
> >  #endif
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_TREE_SRCU
> > +   mod->srcu_struct_ptrs = section_objs(info, "___srcu_struct_ptrs",
> > +                                        sizeof(*mod->srcu_struct_ptrs),
> > +                                        &mod->num_srcu_structs);
> > +#endif
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS
> >     mod->bpf_raw_events = section_objs(info, "__bpf_raw_tp_map",
> >                                        sizeof(*mod->bpf_raw_events),
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > index 9b761e546de8..ac0f6f0a8916 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> > @@ -1310,3 +1310,70 @@ void __init srcu_init(void)
> >             queue_work(rcu_gp_wq, &ssp->work.work);
> >     }
> >  }
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> > +
> > +/* Initialize any global-scope srcu_struct structures used by this module. 
> > */
> > +static int srcu_module_coming(struct module *mod)
> > +{
> > +   int i;
> > +   struct srcu_struct **sspp = mod->srcu_struct_ptrs;
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0; i < mod->num_srcu_structs; i++) {
> > +           ret = init_srcu_struct(*(sspp++));
> > +           if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ret))
> > +                   return ret;
> > +   }
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Clean up any global-scope srcu_struct structures used by this module. */
> > +static void srcu_module_going(struct module *mod)
> > +{
> > +   int i;
> > +   struct srcu_struct **sspp = mod->srcu_struct_ptrs;
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0; i < mod->num_srcu_structs; i++)
> > +           cleanup_srcu_struct(*(sspp++));
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Handle one module, either coming or going. */
> > +static int srcu_module_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> > +                         unsigned long val, void *data)
> > +{
> > +   struct module *mod = data;
> > +   int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +   switch (val) {
> > +   case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
> > +           ret = srcu_module_coming(mod);
> > +           break;
> > +   case MODULE_STATE_LIVE:
> > +           break;
> > +   case MODULE_STATE_GOING:
> > +           srcu_module_going(mod);
> > +           break;
> > +   case MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED:
> > +           break;
> 
> The unused cases can be put under default or even clubbed thus saving a line
> but if you prefer to keep them.like this that is fine.

Well, saving two lines is saving two lines, so will apply.

> It looks good to me but I will test it out more later today. Thanks!

Thank you!

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> - Joel
> 
> 
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct notifier_block srcu_module_nb = {
> > +   .notifier_call = srcu_module_notify,
> > +   .priority = 0,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static __init int init_srcu_module_notifier(void)
> > +{
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   ret = register_module_notifier(&srcu_module_nb);
> > +   if (ret)
> > +           pr_warn("Failed to register srcu module notifier\n");
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> > +late_initcall(init_srcu_module_notifier);
> > +
> > +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES */
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm

Reply via email to