On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 6:29 PM Verma, Vishal L <vishal.l.ve...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 17:44 -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote: > > > > In running with these patches, and testing the offlining part, I ran > > > into the following lockdep below. > > > > > > This is with just these three patches on top of -rc7. > > > > Hi Verma, > > > > Thank you for testing. I wonder if there is a command sequence that I > > could run to reproduce it? > > Also, could you please send your config and qemu arguments. > > > Yes, here is the qemu config: > > qemu-system-x86_64 > -machine accel=kvm > -machine > pc-i440fx-2.6,accel=kvm,usb=off,vmport=off,dump-guest-core=off,nvdimm > -cpu Haswell-noTSX > -m 12G,slots=3,maxmem=44G > -realtime mlock=off > -smp 8,sockets=2,cores=4,threads=1 > -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3,mem=6G > -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=4-7,mem=6G > -numa node,nodeid=2 > -numa node,nodeid=3 > -drive > file=/virt/fedora-test.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk1 > -device > virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,bus=pci.0,addr=0x9,drive=drive-virtio-disk1,id=virtio-disk1,bootindex=1 > -object > memory-backend-file,id=mem1,share,mem-path=/virt/nvdimm1,size=16G,align=128M > -device nvdimm,memdev=mem1,id=nv1,label-size=2M,node=2 > -object > memory-backend-file,id=mem2,share,mem-path=/virt/nvdimm2,size=16G,align=128M > -device nvdimm,memdev=mem2,id=nv2,label-size=2M,node=3 > -serial stdio > -display none > > For the command list - I'm using WIP patches to ndctl/daxctl to add the > command I mentioned earlier. Using this command, I can reproduce the > lockdep issue. I thought I should be able to reproduce the issue by > onlining/offlining through sysfs directly too - something like: > > node="$(cat /sys/bus/dax/devices/dax0.0/target_node)" > for mem in /sys/devices/system/node/node"$node"/memory*; do > echo "offline" > $mem/state > done > > But with that I can't reproduce the problem. > > I'll try to dig a bit deeper into what might be happening, the daxctl > modifications simply amount to doing the same thing as above in C, so > I'm not immediately sure what might be happening. > > If you're interested, I can post the ndctl patches - maybe as an RFC - > to test with.
I could apply the patches and test with them. Also, could you please send your kernel config. Thank you, Pasha > > Thanks, > -Vishal > > > _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm