Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-05-14 15:16:55) > diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c > index 86f65ba2bcf92..a15e6f8c41582 100644 > --- a/kunit/test.c > +++ b/kunit/test.c [..] > + > +void *kunit_kmalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) > +{ > + struct kunit_kmalloc_params params; > + struct kunit_resource *res; > + > + params.size = size; > + params.gfp = gfp; > + > + res = kunit_alloc_resource(test, > + kunit_kmalloc_init, > + kunit_kmalloc_free, > + ¶ms); > + > + if (res) > + return res->allocation; > + else > + return NULL;
Can be written as if (res) return .... return and some static analysis tools prefer this. > +} > + > +void kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test) > +{ > + struct kunit_resource *resource, *resource_safe; > + unsigned long flags; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags); Ah ok, test->lock is protecting everything now? Does it need to be a spinlock, or can it be a mutex? > + list_for_each_entry_safe(resource, > + resource_safe, > + &test->resources, > + node) { > + kunit_free_resource(test, resource); > + } > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags); > +} > + _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm