On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:39 PM Stephen Boyd <sb...@kernel.org> wrote: > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:17) > > diff --git a/arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig > > b/arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000000..bfe49689038f1 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig > > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ > > +CONFIG_OF=y > > +CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST=y > > +CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY=y > > +CONFIG_I2C=y > > +CONFIG_I2C_MUX=y > > +CONFIG_KUNIT=y > > +CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y > > +CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=y > > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config > > b/tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000000..bfe49689038f1 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/configs/all_tests.config > > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ > > +CONFIG_OF=y > > +CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST=y > > +CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY=y > > +CONFIG_I2C=y > > +CONFIG_I2C_MUX=y > > Are these above config options necessary? I don't think they're part of > the patch series anymore so it looks odd to enable the OF unittests and > i2c configs.
Oh whoops, I forgot that we dropped the OF_UNITTEST from this patchset. Will fix. > > +CONFIG_KUNIT=y > > +CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y > > +CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=y _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
