On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:57 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Changes since v7:
> - This is mostly a resend to get it refreshed in Ingo's inbox for v5.5
>   consideration. It picks up a Reviewed-by on patch4 from Ard, has a
>   minor cosmetic rebase on v5.4-rc6 with no other changes, it merges
>   cleanly with tip/master, and is still passing the test case described in
>   the final patch, but development is otherwise idle over the past 3
>   weeks.
>
> [1]: 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/157118756627.2063440.9878062995925617180.st...@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/
>
> ---
> Merge notes:
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> This is ready to go as far as I'm concerned. Please consider merging, or
> acking for Rafael to take, or of course naking if something looks off.
> Rafael had threatened to start taking the standalone ACPI bits through
> his tree, but I have yet to any movement on that in his 'linux-next' or
> 'bleeding-edge' tree.

Indeed.

I have waited for comments on x86 bits from Thomas, but since they are
not coming, I have just decided to take patch [1/12] from this series,
which should be totally non-controversial,  as keeping it out of the
tree has become increasingly painful (material depending on it has
been piling up already for some time).

If need be, I can expose that commit in an immutable branch, so please
let me know if that's necessary.

BTW, Dan, I think that it was a mistake to make the rest of your
series depend on that patch.  The new directory could have been
created at any convenient time later.

Cheers,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-le...@lists.01.org

Reply via email to