On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 1:23 PM Luck, Tony <tony.l...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> I think they do. If the result of the wrong data has already
> been sent out the network before you process the signal, then you
> will need far smarter application software than has ever been written
> to hunt it down and stop the spread of the bogus result.
Bah. That's a completely red herring argument.
By "asynchronous" I don't mean "hours later".
Make it be "interrupts are enabled, before serializing instruction".
Yes, we want bounded error handling latency. But that doesn't mean "synchronous"
Linus
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-le...@lists.01.org
