On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:02:58PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:50:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:03:16AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Thursday 18 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > convert to use ioremap() and __raw_{read/write} friends.
> > > 
> > > Why is this going to the OMAP list, not to LKML and cc'd
> > > the watchdog maintainer?  (I added Wim to the cc list...)
> > > 
> > > If it's worth having, it's worth having in mainline...
> > 
> > Indeed, this is definitely something that can go into mainline now and
> > trickle back down into the OMAP tree.
> > 
> > In other words, don't merge this into any OMAP tree, but get it into
> > mainline and wait for it to come back.  Same goes for any other fixes.
> > That means less work needs to be done by a very small number of
> > individuals who don't have enough time to push everything from the OMAP
> > tree upstream.
> 
> Unfortunately I'll have to disagree here, a diff on omap_wdt.c against
> mainline shows quite a few changes since omap3 was introduced. Several
> patches never went to mainline. I'll prepare a sync up patch from omap to
> mainline and send both, but the omap3 stuff, won't be able to go in.
> Maybe i'll try to get rid of all the if (cpu_is_XXX()) stuff in
> omap_wdt.c and then send my patch on top of that.

Actually, you're wrong on that.  You can take the entire driver and
build it as it currently stands in mainline.  I just did exactly
that by doing the following:

$ diff -u linux-2.6-rmk/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c \
  linux-2.6-omap/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c > wdt.diff
$ cd linux-2.6-rmk
$ patch -p1 -i ../wdt.diff
patching file drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
$ emake O=../build/omap2/ drivers/watchdog/
...
  CC      drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.o
  LD      drivers/watchdog/built-in.o

So there should be no problems with merging up the OMAP3 changes in
this driver.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to