----- Original Message ----- From: "Misael Lopez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gadiyar, Anand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>; "Pandita, Vikram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH][OMAPZOOM] OMAP3: Fix handling of McBSP registers XCCR and RCCR for OMAP2430/34xx


> @@ -403,8 +408,10 @@ struct omap_mcbsp_reg_cfg {
>  u16 rcerh;
>  u16 xcerg;
>  u16 xcerh;
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2430) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP34XX)
>  u16 xccr;
>  u16 rccr;
> +#endif
>  };

Won't this cause a compilation break on non-2430/34xx platforms
because you refer to these variables below?
True... I didn't consider that. Then for non-2430/34xx platforms,
having those registers in the structure but avoiding to write to them
is enough, correct? or any other alternative?

Since you write those registers conditionally for 2430/34xx, i guess removing ifdef should do..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to