* Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> [140113 08:48]: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:24:37PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 05:21:11PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> [140102 07:11]: > > > > The following patch series moves code to setup the DMA hardware and > > > > service interrupts from the hardware to the DMA engine driver. This > > > > reduces the dependency on the legacy DMA implementation. > > > > > > > > This series does not remove the channel allocation/freeing hooks which > > > > are used to manage the allocation of physical channels - this is the > > > > next step in the evolution. > > > > > > > > The patches which move the interrupt handling are currently less than > > > > perfect since they're writing to ENABLE_L0 under a different spinlock, > > > > and hence RFC only at the moment. > > > > > > Nice to see this happening. These seem to work for me based on a quick > > > try on omap2+, but on omap1 the build fails: > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c: In function ‘dma_write’: > > > arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c:186: error: ‘const struct omap_dma_reg’ has no > > > member named ‘size’ > > > > Right, needs this incremental patch: > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c > > index 3afde9628839..404f89e3eeb8 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c > > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static inline void dma_write(u32 val, int reg, int lch) > > addr += reg_map[reg].stride * lch; > > > > __raw_writew(val, addr); > > - if (reg_map[reg].size == OMAP_DMA_REG_2X16BIT) > > + if (reg_map[reg].type == OMAP_DMA_REG_2X16BIT) > > __raw_writew(val >> 16, addr + 2); > > } > > > > @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static inline u32 dma_read(int reg, int lch) > > addr += reg_map[reg].stride * lch; > > > > val = __raw_readw(addr); > > - if (reg_map[reg].size == OMAP_DMA_REG_2X16BIT) > > + if (reg_map[reg].type == OMAP_DMA_REG_2X16BIT) > > val |= __raw_readw(addr + 2) << 16; > > > > return val; > > > > Any news on this?
Sorry for the delay, now getting this: arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c: In function ‘omap1_system_dma_init’: arch/arm/mach-omap1/dma.c:368: error: ‘struct omap_dma_dev_attr’ has no member named ‘chan’ Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
