On 04/11/2014 11:17 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Tuesday 01 April 2014 06:36 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Use the EVENTQ_1 for default and leave the EVENTQ_0 to be used by high >> priority channels, like audio. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com> > > Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com> > >> --- >> arch/arm/common/edma.c | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/edma.c b/arch/arm/common/edma.c >> index 86a8b263278f..19520e2519d9 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/common/edma.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/common/edma.c >> @@ -1546,7 +1546,8 @@ static int edma_of_parse_dt(struct device *dev, >> >> pdata->queue_priority_mapping = queue_priority_map; >> >> - pdata->default_queue = 0; >> + /* select queue 1 as default */ > > It will be nice to expand the comment with explanation of why this is > being chosen as default (lower priority queue by default for typical > bulk data transfer).
Yes, extended comment is a good idea. For the next version I think I'm going to change the code around default TC/Queue and the non default queue selection, mostly based on Joel's comment: EVENTQ_1 as default queue. Set the EVENTQ_1 priority to 7 EVENTQ_0 priority is going to stay 0 and EVENTQ_2 as 2 Add new member to struct edma, like high_pri_queue. When we set the queue priorities in edma_probe() we look for the highest priority queue and save the number in high_pri_queue. I will rename the edma_request_non_default_queue() to edma_request_high_pri_queue() and it will assign the channel to the high priority queue. I think this way it is going to be more explicit and IMHO a bit more safer in a sense the we are going to get high priority when we ask for it. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
