On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 10:46 +0200, Eero Nurkkala wrote: > > How about McBSP? Same TRM.. I2C, Table 18-5 tells exactly the opposite > for I2C than what's said in Table 18-44: I2C_SYSC!! > > Please, Richard? > > - Eero
To answer to myself, I am 100% certain the McBSP FCLK is the bit 8. I should have sent a patch about that already.. Kind of worried as could they really change that much? >From page to page and block to block and within a block...=) - Eero -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
