On Wednesday 23 April 2014 11:41 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > Replace the clk_enable()s with a clk_prepare_enable() and > the clk_disables()s with a clk_disable_unprepare() > > This never showed issues due to the OMAP platform code (hwmod) > leaving these clocks in clk_prepare()ed state by default. > > Reported-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com> > Cc: linux-g...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilim...@ti.com> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com>
Linus, Do you mind picking this fix up via the GPIO tree? Alternatively you could Ack this if you are fine and we can take both Patch 1/2 and Patch 2/2 from this series via the OMAP tree. Patch 2/2 has a dependency on Patch 1/2 and they need to go in in that order else gpio would break. More discussions are here [1]. Let us know what you think. Thanks. regards, Rajendra [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org/msg02801.html > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c > index 19b886c..78bc5a4 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static inline void _gpio_rmw(void __iomem *base, u32 reg, > u32 mask, bool set) > static inline void _gpio_dbck_enable(struct gpio_bank *bank) > { > if (bank->dbck_enable_mask && !bank->dbck_enabled) { > - clk_enable(bank->dbck); > + clk_prepare_enable(bank->dbck); > bank->dbck_enabled = true; > > writel_relaxed(bank->dbck_enable_mask, > @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static inline void _gpio_dbck_disable(struct gpio_bank > *bank) > */ > writel_relaxed(0, bank->base + bank->regs->debounce_en); > > - clk_disable(bank->dbck); > + clk_disable_unprepare(bank->dbck); > bank->dbck_enabled = false; > } > } > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static void _set_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, > unsigned gpio, > > l = GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio); > > - clk_enable(bank->dbck); > + clk_prepare_enable(bank->dbck); > reg = bank->base + bank->regs->debounce; > writel_relaxed(debounce, reg); > > @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void _set_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, > unsigned gpio, > bank->dbck_enable_mask = val; > > writel_relaxed(val, reg); > - clk_disable(bank->dbck); > + clk_disable_unprepare(bank->dbck); > /* > * Enable debounce clock per module. > * This call is mandatory because in omap_gpio_request() when > @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static void _clear_gpio_debounce(struct gpio_bank *bank, > unsigned gpio) > bank->context.debounce = 0; > writel_relaxed(bank->context.debounce, bank->base + > bank->regs->debounce); > - clk_disable(bank->dbck); > + clk_disable_unprepare(bank->dbck); > bank->dbck_enabled = false; > } > } > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
