On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Andreas Müller <schnitzelt...@googlemail.com> [140509 14:07]:
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ti.com> wrote:
>> > On 30/04/14 02:52, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> >> Otherwise we can get often errors like the following and the
>> >> display won't come on:
>> >>
>> >> omapdss APPLY error: FIFO UNDERFLOW on gfx, disabling the overlay
>> >> omapdss APPLY error: SYNC_LOST on channel lcd, restarting
>> >> the output with video overlays disabled
>> >>
>> >> There are some earlier references to this issue:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg59511.html
>> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg59724.html
>> >
>> resend - my client had HTML enabled...
>>
>> FWIW: I have had issues long time ago [1]. With mainline 3.14.3 I had
>> still the reboot problem on old 600MHz OMAP 3530. Applying this patch
>> solved the issues. For other versions I had no chance to reproduce the
>> original wakup issue mentioned in old thread
>
> Sorry I'm a bit confused now. Is the reboot issue a separate issue
> related to the twl4030 generic scripts for 3530?
>
> And then this patch fixes dm3730 wake-up (from suspend?) issues?
>
> Or do we have some other bug where we wrongly hit omap3630_dss_feats
> on 3530 somehow?
(What I think) I have done: Have 3.14.3 still booting with legacy
board init (please don't kill me for that). Without applying your
patch old OMAP3530 crashed at every reboot with SYNCH_LOST.

After applying your patch reboot works fine.

Looking into id-code makes me wonder what changes on 36xx-features do
to 35xx devices (treated as 34xx - right?). The only way that this
happens is for unknown hawkeye fallthough. I suggest you simply forget
my note and I will find out what really 'fixed' dss reboot problem.

Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to