The GPIO IRQ enable/disable path attempts to also enable IRQ wake
support for the parent GPIO bank IRQ as well. However, since there is
no 'set_wake' hook for the bank IRQs, these calls will always fail.
Also, since the enable will fail on the suspend path, the disable on
the resume path will trigger unbalanced enable/disable warnings.
This was discovered in the suspend/resume path on OMAP3/Beagle using
the gpio-keys driver which disables/re-enables GPIO IRQ wakeups in the
suspend/resume path.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com>
---
This patch was sent on 28 jan 2009 as:
[PATCH omap-fixes] OMAP2/3: GPIO: remove recursion in IRQ wakeup path
This version simply updates the description to better describe the problem
and solution.
arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c | 14 ++++----------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
index f856a90..798a8cd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c
@@ -837,13 +837,10 @@ static int _set_gpio_wakeup(struct gpio_bank *bank, int
gpio, int enable)
case METHOD_MPUIO:
case METHOD_GPIO_1610:
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
- if (enable) {
+ if (enable)
bank->suspend_wakeup |= (1 << gpio);
- enable_irq_wake(bank->irq);
- } else {
- disable_irq_wake(bank->irq);
+ else
bank->suspend_wakeup &= ~(1 << gpio);
- }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
return 0;
#endif
@@ -856,13 +853,10 @@ static int _set_gpio_wakeup(struct gpio_bank *bank, int
gpio, int enable)
return -EINVAL;
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
- if (enable) {
+ if (enable)
bank->suspend_wakeup |= (1 << gpio);
- enable_irq_wake(bank->irq);
- } else {
- disable_irq_wake(bank->irq);
+ else
bank->suspend_wakeup &= ~(1 << gpio);
- }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
return 0;
#endif
--
1.6.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
