On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Brian Norris wrote:
> Other random thought: it seems like any irqchip driver which does lazy IRQ
> masking ought to use IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND. So maybe the IRQ core should
> just
> do something like:
>
> if (!chip->irq_disable)
> chip->flags |= IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND;
No. Lazy irq disable and the suspend logic are different beasts.
That's up to the platform to decide this. Just for the record: there
is a world outside of ARM...
But that brings me to a different question:
Why are you not putting that customization into the device tree
instead of trying to add this to some random arch/arm/mach-foo
files?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
