On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Felipe Balbi <m...@felipebalbi.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:55:50PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: >> Ben's right, there shouldn't be any need for this. This patch could cause >> some unnecessary interrupt service latency. > > That's not what Thomas Gleixner thinks. How about the possibility of > stack overflow ? > > According to Thomas (and Ingo, I'd say) all drivers should call > request_irq() with IRQF_DISABLED and that's gonna be true as soon as the > threaded irq handler support gets merged, if I'm not wrong.
That's my understanding too, but I think it has always been true: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123607685804562&w=2 -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
