On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Nicholas Krause wrote: > This patch changes this function to check for if v is returning value from the > called function. If not it does the else. Furthermore fixes the FIXME message > above > if statement for holding INVERT_ENABLE bit when not needing to be checked for > in if statement by just checking for if v is not Null. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com>
This patch doesn't make any sense. Neither does the commit message. Please explain exactly what this patch is intended to do in terms of the clock framework or the hardware. - Paul > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c > index 591581a..626363d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c > @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ void omap2_dflt_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw) > } > > v = omap2_clk_readl(clk, clk->enable_reg); > - if (clk->flags & INVERT_ENABLE) > + if (v) > v |= (1 << clk->enable_bit); > else > v &= ~(1 << clk->enable_bit); > -- > 1.9.1 > - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
