On 11/09/2014 11:03 PM, Keerthy wrote:
> Correct returning IRQ_HANDLED unconditionally in the irq handler.
> Return IRQ_NONE for some interrupt which we do not expect to be
> handled in this handler. This prevents kernel stalling with back
> to back spurious interrupts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>

Consider providing an appropriate fixes comment here as well?

> ---
>  drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c |    8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c b/drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c
> index b5eac29..17d8659 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c
> @@ -222,10 +222,14 @@ static irqreturn_t l3_interrupt_handler(int irq, void 
> *_l3)
>                       }
>  
>                       /* Error found so break the for loop */
> -                     break;
> +                     return IRQ_HANDLED;
>               }
>       }
> -     return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
> +     dev_err(l3->dev, "L3 %s IRQ not handled!!\n",
> +             inttype ? "debug" : "application");
> +
> +     return IRQ_NONE;
>  }
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id l3_noc_match[] = {
> 


-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to