On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 05:05:08PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Is this applicable for OMAP5 also? > If not can you drop omap5 from $subject?
DRA7xx = OMAP57xx, which to me is an omap5. Isn't it? And I haven't been able to get a manual for the omap54xx to confirm it, although it seems it does not apply to the omap54xx from what I have been able to gather indirectly. arch_timer_freq = (rate / den) * num; If I do this with the workaround I get: 20000000 / 75 * 244 = 6147525 where as 20000000 * 244 / 75 = 6147540 best value would be 6147541 with proper rounding. In the normal case the worst case is: 26000000 * 384 = 9984000000 That is too big for 32 bits. Now what could be done is prescale by 4 to make the worst case still fit in 32 bits while doing the multiplication before the division, so like this: arch_timer_freq = ((rate / 4) * num / den ) * 4; That gives the same result in all cases including the errata case for the dra7xx at 20MHz and 27MHz. It is off by 3 in the 19.2MHz case though which isn't so nice. Would that be more acceptable? I think having the arch_timer_freq calculated for the errata case seperately from the normal case is cleaner looking compared to that mess and gives a better result for the 19.2MHz case. -- Len Sorensen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
