On Wednesday 26 August 2015 06:13 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 08/26/2015 05:37 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Friday 14 August 2015 09:31 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> From: John Ogness <john.ogn...@linutronix.de>
>>>
>>> That bitfield is modified by read + or + write operation. If someone
>>> sets any of the other two bits it might render the lock useless.
>>>
>>> While at it, remove other bitfields as well to avoid more such
>>> errors.
>>>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogn...@linutronix.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de>
>>
>> Tested with wilink BT module on TI's DRA7 EVM.
>>
>> Tested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com>
> 
> Already in Greg's tty-next tree (and 4.3-rc1 pull request), Sekhar.

Oops, no problem. Did not notice that.

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to