Suman Anna <s-a...@ti.com> writes:
> Add the DT node for Timer12 present on DRA7 family of
> SoCs. Timer12 is present in PD_WKUPAON power domain, and
> has the same capabilities as the other timers, except for
> the fact that it serves as a secure timer on HS devices
> and is clocked only from the secure 32K clock.
>
> The node is marked disabled for now, and the kernel should
> refrain from using this secure timer on HS devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-a...@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> index e289c706d27d..37d632dad576 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> @@ -762,6 +762,16 @@
> ti,hwmods = "timer11";
> };
>
> + timer12: timer@4ae20000 {
> + compatible = "ti,omap5430-timer";
> + reg = <0x4ae20000 0x80>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 90 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + ti,hwmods = "timer12";
> + ti,timer-alwon;
> + ti,timer-secure;
> + status = "disabled";according to Tony we should avoid using status at all for in-SoC devices. Tony, can you confirm I understood you correctly ? -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
