* Pierre Ossman <pie...@ossman.eu> [090426 12:22]:
> Should I queue this up or do you want to do something differently for
> this?

Looks like a valid fix to me.

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>
 
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:55:21 +1000
> Ben Nizette <b...@niasdigital.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > disable_irq() should wait for all running handlers to complete
> > before returning.  As such, if it's used to disable an interrupt
> > from that interrupt's handler it will deadlock.  This replaces
> > the dangerous instances with the _nosync() variant which doesn't
> > have this problem.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Nizette <b...@niasdigital.com>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
> > index 5570849..d5ea652 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap.c
> > @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mmc_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >             del_timer(&host->cmd_abort_timer);
> >             host->abort = 1;
> >             OMAP_MMC_WRITE(host, IE, 0);
> > -           disable_irq(host->irq);
> > +           disable_irq_nosync(host->irq);
> >             schedule_work(&host->cmd_abort_work);
> >             return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >     }
> 
> 
> -- 
>      -- Pierre Ossman
> 
>   WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
>   Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
>   for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
>   encryption.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to