On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 11:59:14AM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> @@ -196,7 +199,10 @@ void __init omap2_check_revision(void)
> * At this point we have an idea about the processor revision set
> * earlier with omap2_set_globals_tap().
> */
> - if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
> + if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> + printk(KERN_INFO "FIXME: CPU revision = OMAP4430\n");
> + return;
> + } else if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
Can we keep things here in numeric order? So leave cpu_is_omap24xx()
at the top and add the additional omap44xx stuff at the bottoom.
> @@ -30,7 +32,9 @@
> #include <mach/sdrc.h>
> #include <mach/gpmc.h>
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4 /* FIXME: Remove this once clkdev is ready */
> #include "clock.h"
> +#endif
Hmm. Tony: we really need to eliminate data inside header files. It's
not nice to have data structures created by merely including some header
file that also contains function prototypes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
