David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:02 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 17:25 +0530, vimal singh wrote:
+ /* The fifo depth is 64 bytes. We have a sync at each frame and frame
+ * length is 64 bytes.
+ */
+ int buf_len = len/64;
To optimize performance it is better not to rely on gcc and use <<
If you ever see gcc screwing up division of an 'int' by a constant 64,
file a GCC bug.
I did see gcc generated division instruction instead of shift
instruction on x86 when the kernel is compiles with size optimization.
I think this is because it division instruction is shorter.
The exact place I we saw was the UBIFS binary search function, and
division by 2 was not compiled into a shift instruction.
So what I suggested is to use shift explicitly if this is wanted.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
