On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 08:05:09PM +0530, C.A, Subramaniam wrote: > Currently, this facilitates both the tesla and ducati > sides to request for the same irq through an > omap_mbox_get() call.
You're dropping IRQF_DISABLED - is this safe? Why was the original code using it? Do you need IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_SHARED ? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
