Madhusudhan Chikkature wrote:
Hi Dirk,

I am inlining the patch so that it helps review.
...
@@ -1165,8 +1178,15 @@ static void omap_hsmmc_set_ios(struct mm
                break;
        case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_4:
                OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, CON, con & ~DW8);
-               OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
-                       OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL) | FOUR_BIT);
+               if (mmc_card_sdio(host->mmc->card)) {

I wish it could be moved to "enable_sdio_irq" so that we can avoid inclusion of
card.h and checking the type of card in the host controller driver.

Yes, this would be the real clean way. But ...

But the
dependancy on 4-bit seems to be a problem here.

... most probably we have to find a workaround until (if ever?) above clean implementation is available.

What we need is after SDIO mode and bus width is known, and before the first interrupt comes, to set IBG.

On the problems being discussed on testing is the interrupt source geting
cleared at the SDIO card level upon genaration of the CIRQ? If not it remains
asserted.

Yes, this seems to be exactly the problem John reports in his follow up mail.

Any hint how to clear SDIO interrupt?

Many thanks

Dirk

+                       OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
+                                        OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL)
+                                        | IBG | FOUR_BIT);
+               } else {
+                       OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, HCTL,
+                                        OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, HCTL)
+                                        | FOUR_BIT);
+               }
                break;
        case MMC_BUS_WIDTH_1:
                OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, CON, con & ~DW8);
@@ -1512,6 +1532,24 @@ static int omap_hsmmc_disable_fclk(struc
        return 0;
 }

+static void omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enable)
+{
+       struct omap_hsmmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
+       u32 ie, ise;
+
+       ise = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, ISE);
+       ie  = OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, IE);
+
+       if (enable) {
+               OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, ise | CIRQ_ENABLE);
+               OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE,  ie  | CIRQ_ENABLE);
+       } else {
+               OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, ISE, ise & ~CIRQ_ENABLE);
+               OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, IE,  ie  & ~CIRQ_ENABLE);
+       }
+
+}
+
 static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hsmmc_ops = {
        .enable = omap_hsmmc_enable_fclk,
        .disable = omap_hsmmc_disable_fclk,
@@ -1519,7 +1557,7 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hs
        .set_ios = omap_hsmmc_set_ios,
        .get_cd = omap_hsmmc_get_cd,
        .get_ro = omap_hsmmc_get_ro,
-       /* NYET -- enable_sdio_irq */
+       .enable_sdio_irq = omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq,
 };

 static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hsmmc_ps_ops = {
@@ -1529,7 +1567,7 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops omap_hs
        .set_ios = omap_hsmmc_set_ios,
        .get_cd = omap_hsmmc_get_cd,
        .get_ro = omap_hsmmc_get_ro,
-       /* NYET -- enable_sdio_irq */
+       .enable_sdio_irq = omap_hsmmc_enable_sdio_irq,
 };

 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
@@ -1734,7 +1772,7 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struc
        mmc->max_seg_size = mmc->max_req_size;

        mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED |
-                    MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY;
+                    MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY | MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ;

        if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 8)
                mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;





John Rigby wrote:
I have seen several discussions about lack of sdio irq support in the
hsmmc driver but no patches.  Has anyone on this list implemented this
and/or can anyone point me to patches?
What a coincidence ;)

I'm currently working on this. See attachment what I currently have.
It is compile tested only against recent omap linux head. I don't have
a board using SDIO at the moment, so no real testing possible :(

Some background, maybe it helps people to step in:

Gumstix OMAP3 based Overo air board connects Marvell 88W8686 wifi by
MMC port 2 in 4 bit configuration [1]. The wifi performance is quite
bad (~100kB/s). There is some rumor that this might be SDIO irq
related [2]. There was an attempt to fix this [3] already, but this
doesn't work [4]. Having this, I started to look into it.

I used [3], the TI Davinci driver [5] (supporting SDIO irq), the SDIO
Simplified Specification [6] and the OMAP35x TRM [7] as starting points.

Unfortunately, the Davinci MMC registers and irqs are different
(Davinci has a dedicated SDIO irq). But combining [3] and [5] helps to
get an idea what has to be done.

I think the main issues of [3] were that it doesn't enable IBG for 4
bit mode ([6] chapter 8.1.2) and that mmc_omap_irq() doesn't reset the
irq bits.

Topics I still open:

- Is it always necessary to deal with IE _and_ ISE register? I'm not
totally clear what the difference between these two registers are ;)
And in which order they have to be set.

- Davinci driver [5] in line 1115 checks for data line to call
mmc_signal_sdio_irq() for irq enable.

- Davinci driver deals with SDIO in xfer_done() (line 873)

- Davinci driver sets block size to 64 if SDIO in line 701

It would be quite nice if anybody likes to comment on attachment and
help testing.

Many thanks and best regards

Dirk

[1] http://gumstix.net/wiki/index.php?title=Overo_Wifi

[2] http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/msg/14e822778c5eeb56

[3] http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/msg/d0eb69f4c20673be

[4] http://groups.google.com/group/beagleboard/msg/5cdfe2a319531937

[5]
http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=linux-davinci.git;a=blob;f=drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c;h=1bf0587250614c6d8abfe02028b96e0e47148ac8;hb=HEAD

[6] http://www.sdcard.org/developers/tech/sdio/sd_bluetooth_spec/

[7] http://focus.ti.com/lit/ug/spruf98c/spruf98c.pdf






--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to