On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > Thanks for your review time.
Thank you for doing this work :-) > Since I started with just duplicating files and then removing unnecessary > sections, I wondered how I could split that work into several subsequent > patches so it is more easy to verify how those chunks put into a new file > differ from those extracted from the old one, but didn't find a good solution > yet. Looking through the code, you've cleaned up several things that indicate that you've put some thought and care into doing it (e.g., all the cpu_class_is_omap1(), for example). Plus, you mention that you've tested the code on OMAP1 and compile-tested on OMAP2. So it seems fine to me after those two minor changes are made that I mentioned in the last E-mail. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
