> From: Cousson, Benoit [mailto:b-cous...@ti.com] > Sent: 28 January 2010 13:48 > To: Dasgupta, Romit; Menon, Nishanth > Cc: linux-omap; Andrew Murray; Kevin Hilman > Subject: RE: [PATCH] omap3: pm: cpufreq: populate l3 opp1 again
> I don't want to keep it. I just want to document it in order to explain > why the code is not aligned with the public doc. > > Andrew did ask the question so the answer might be useful for others as > well, hence a small comment on top of the CORE OPP list. > > Benoit I agree. I don't think it matters if the OPP 'OMAP_OPP_DEF' is there or not. Though as the OPPs differ to the hardware descriptions it should be documented - perhaps as suggested, by a comment. It is confusing when validating the power management software support - and the best place to look for the rationale is in the code. Andrew Murray -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
