> -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Shevchenko [mailto:andy.shevche...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 3:23 AM > To: Hebbar, Shivananda > Cc: linux-omap > Subject: Re: [Patchv2 0/8] DSPBRIDGE: typedef cleanup > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Hebbar, Shivananda <x0heb...@ti.com> > wrote: > > Resending the patches after updating review comments and also > > Fixing some compilation breaks. > > Sorry for late question, however, I fully agree with HANDLE -> void *, > but why u32 is not normal type for those changes? What do I miss? > The idea was to remove typedef and while doing so thought int is sufficient to represent the DSPRTOS type hence changed it from u32 to int.
I agree that u32 is a normal type. --Shivananda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
