"Gopinath, Thara" <th...@ti.com> writes: >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com] >>>Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:58 PM >>>To: Gopinath, Thara >>>Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; p...@pwsan.com; Menon, Nishanth; Cousson, >>>Benoit; Sripathy, >>>Vishwanath; Sawant, Anand >>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] OMAP3: PM: Convert smartreflex driver into a >>>platform driver using hwmods >>>and omap-device layer >>> >>>Thara Gopinath <th...@ti.com> writes: >>> >>>> This patch converts the exisitng smartreflex library into a >>>> platform driver with device , driver registrations using hardware mods. >>>> As part of this Ntarget values are passed as platform data. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <th...@ti.com> >>> >>>Nice work Thara. This is good. Some minor comments below, but some >>>general comments first. >>> >>>As discussed, eventually (longer term) we'll want to move the driver >>>parts of this to a regulator driver. To ease that transition, I think >>>it would be nice to start now by separating the driver portions of >>>this file from the device portions. >>> >>>You've already done a good job of keeping them separate in this file >>>(most of the device stuff is at the end) but I think having a separate >>>file is probably even better. Maybe move driver stuff to sr_driver.c >>>and leave device stuff in smartreflex.c? I don't care much about the >>>names at this point. > > Quick question.. If we are going to separate out smartreflex device > portions from this file , can't we keep them in devices.c instead of > going for a separate file?
Ultimately, that's Tony's call, but I would prefer to see a separate specific file for SR device init. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
