On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:55:03PM +0200, ext Nishanth Menon wrote:
some reasons why i love switch statements ;) since I dont expect other than precisely 4 and 8 (do we expect 5,6,7 - i might be wrong).. but if it is so, wont the following be better?switch (mmc_slot(host).wires) { case 8: mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA; /* fall thru*/ case 4: mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA; break; default: WARN("bad width"); }
I like that, but I remember Madhu (or someone else) saying he thinks it's less readable this way. Go figure...
-- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
