On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Mike Rapoport <m...@compulab.co.il> [100422 01:41]:
>> Ghorai, Sukumar wrote:
>>
>> CM-T35, for instance can be assembled with different NAND flash
>> chips. Besides, boards that use NAND as primary boot device, we
>> anyway depend on proper GPMC configuration in the bootloader chain.
>> Having ability to define GPMC timings in the kernel and keep the
>> settings made by the bootloader adds flexibility level for board
>> designers.
>
> Not implementing the retime function for GPMC will cause issues
> with PM as you cannot scale the L3 frequency without breaking
> your GPMC timings.

BTW, there is a patch from Stanley.Miao already in LO:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/93613/

But it is still advisable to implement the retime function as stated by Tony.

-- 
Regards,
Vimal Singh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to