On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:03:44AM -0500, Arce, Abraham wrote:
> Hi again Dmitry,
>
> > No worries, although at first I was surprised that Trilok spoke exactly
> > the same words I did ;)
> >
>
> :)
>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +/* Interrupt thread handler thread */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static irqreturn_t omap_keypad_threaded(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > >
> > > > > Why is iti threaded? I fo not see anything that will sleep.
> > >
> > >
> > > It was implemented based on previous comments...
> > >
> >
> > Would you point me to that comment? Like I said, I do not see anything
> > that would possibly sleep in this routine so you don't need to use
> > threaded interrupt.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg26352.html
>
Thanks.
I think Kevin meant "use theaded IRQ, wherever possible" [if we need
to sleep in interrupt handler].
Adding him to CC.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
